Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled Feb. 15, 2023

Figueroa v. The People of The State of New York

Judge
Laura Swain
Docket
1:23-cv-01278
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
5
HabeasCivil ProcedurePro Se
In one sentence

In Figueroa v. The People, Judge Swain ordered a signature and payment or fee-waiver application within 30 days, warning the case would be dismissed if Figueroa did not comply.

Who this affects

Angel Figueroa, who must correct the signature and filing-fee deficiencies within 30 days to avoid dismissal of the action; the People were not required to answer at this stage.

What happened

In Figueroa v. The People of The State of New York, Angel Figueroa filed a petition asking for a court order concerning his parole-revocation matter. The court found that he had submitted the petition without an original signature and without either the $5 filing fee or an application to proceed without paying the fee in advance.

The court ordered Figueroa, within 30 days, to submit a petition page bearing an original signature and either pay the filing fee or submit a completed application to proceed without prepaying fees. The court said no response from the People was required at that time and warned that the action would be dismissed if Figueroa did not comply.

Judge Laura Taylor Swain did not decide the underlying parole or detention issues. She also certified that an appeal would not be taken in good faith and denied permission to appeal without prepaying fees.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Figueroa v. The People of The State of New York · No. 1:23-cv-01278
Judge
Laura Swain
Date
Feb. 15, 2023

Background

Angel Figueroa filed a petition for a writ of habeas corpus and was proceeding without a lawyer. The petition text asserts that New York parole procedures required a preliminary hearing within 15 days and a final revocation hearing within 90 days. It also asserts that the unresolved matter affected Figueroa's federal incarceration and access to reentry programs. The court did not decide those assertions in this order.

Filing Deficiencies

The court explained that court filings must be personally signed by an unrepresented party. It also explained that a habeas petitioner must either pay the $5.00 filing fee or submit a signed application to proceed in forma pauperis, meaning without prepaying court fees. Figueroa submitted the petition without an original signature and without the filing fee or an application to proceed without prepaying fees.

Order and Disposition

The court ordered Figueroa to do both of the following within 30 days of the order: (1) resubmit the petition's signature page with an original signature; and (2) either pay the $5.00 filing fee or complete and submit the attached fee application. The court stated that, if the application is granted, Figueroa may proceed without prepaying the fee. No answer was required at that time. The court stated that the case would be processed under the Clerk's Office procedures if Figueroa complied, but that the action would be dismissed if he did not comply within the allowed time.

The court also certified under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3) that an appeal from the order would not be taken in good faith and denied permission to appeal without prepaying fees. Judge Laura Taylor Swain did not reach the merits of Figueroa's habeas petition.

The authoritative version

Read the full 5-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.