Lanau Aguilar v. Carben Construction Inc.
- Katherine Failla
- 1:22-cv-09685
- U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
- 2
In Lanau Aguilar v. Carben Construction, Judge Failla granted more time to serve two remaining defendants.
Francisco Lanau Aguilar and the remaining individual defendants, Ronald Browning and Anthony Logiudice.
What happened
In Lanau Aguilar v. Carben Construction Inc., Francisco Lanau Aguilar asked for more time to serve Ronald Browning and Anthony Logiudice. His lawyers said additional time was needed to verify their addresses and complete service.
The letter stated that Carben Construction Inc. had been served around November 28, 2022. It requested an extension through March 20, 2023, under the federal rule governing the deadline for serving defendants.
Judge Katherine Polk Failla granted the application and ordered service on the remaining defendants by March 20, 2023. She also directed the Clerk of Court to terminate the pending motion at docket entry 7.
The detailed version
- Lanau Aguilar v. Carben Construction Inc. · No. 1:22-cv-09685
- Katherine Failla
- Feb. 15, 2023
Background
Francisco Lanau Aguilar, through counsel, asked the court to extend the deadline for serving Ronald Browning and Anthony Logiudice. The request cited Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 4(m), which generally requires service within 90 days after a complaint is filed and permits or requires an extension in specified circumstances.
The request stated that process servers had served Carben Construction Inc. on or around November 28, 2022. It said additional time was needed to verify the individual defendants’ addresses and complete service. The letter also stated that the plaintiff intended to continue the case after the defendants appeared or, if they did not appear, seek a judgment based on their failure to respond.
Ruling
Judge Katherine Polk Failla granted the application. The court ordered the plaintiff to serve the remaining defendants by March 20, 2023. The Clerk of Court was directed to terminate the pending motion at docket entry 7. The order addressed the service deadline and did not decide the underlying claims.
Effect
The order extended the time for Francisco Lanau Aguilar to serve Ronald Browning and Anthony Logiudice. The opinion does not state that service had been completed on those defendants by the date of the order.
Read the full 2-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.