Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled Feb. 15, 2023

Cox v. The Green Room WV, LLC

Judge
Rochon
Docket
1:23-cv-01259
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
1
Civil Procedure
In one sentence

In Cox v. The Green Room WV, Judge Rochon ordered the parties to discuss settlement and standing, then report whether they settled.

Who this affects

Prentice Cox, The Green Room WV, LLC, and 257 Bleecker LLC.

What happened

In Cox v. The Green Room WV, LLC, Prentice Cox sued The Green Room WV, LLC and 257 Bleecker LLC. The opinion does not describe the claims or decide their merits.

Judge Rochon ordered the parties to meet for at least one hour within 30 days after the summons and complaint were served and to make a good-faith effort to settle. They were also directed to discuss whether Cox had legally sufficient standing to bring the case and whether court-connected mediation or a settlement conference before a magistrate judge would be useful.

Within 15 additional days, the parties must file a joint letter stating whether they settled. If they did not settle, the letter must ask the court either to refer the case to mediation or a magistrate judge for a settlement conference, or to schedule an initial status conference.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Cox v. The Green Room WV, LLC · No. 1:23-cv-01259
Judge
Rochon
Date
Feb. 15, 2023

Background

Prentice Cox brought this action against The Green Room WV, LLC and 257 Bleecker LLC. The order does not state the claims, the factual allegations, or the relief requested. Judge Jennifer L. Rochon stated that the case had been assigned to her for all purposes.

Court’s Orders

The court ordered the parties to meet and confer for at least one hour within 30 days after service of the summons and complaint. They must make a good-faith effort to settle the action. During those discussions, the parties must consider whether Cox has satisfied the threshold requirement of standing, meaning a legally sufficient connection to the dispute that allows a party to invoke the court’s authority. The order cites Second Circuit decisions concerning standing but does not decide whether Cox has standing.

If the parties cannot settle on their own, they must also discuss whether further settlement discussions through the court’s mediation program or before a magistrate judge would be productive at that time.

Disposition and Next Steps

Within 15 additional days—45 days after service of the summons and complaint—the parties must submit a joint letter telling the court whether they settled. If they did not settle, the letter must request either referral to mediation or to a magistrate judge for a settlement conference, with a preference between those options, or an initial status conference. The order is a case-management directive and does not resolve the parties’ underlying legal claims.

The authoritative version

Read the full 1-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.