Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled Feb. 16, 2023

Windard Bora LLC v. Sotomayor

Judge
Cathy Seibel
Docket
7:21-cv-07161
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
2
Civil Procedure
In one sentence

In Windward Bora LLC v. Sotomayor, Judge Seibel required jurisdictional facts about an LLC’s members before determining diversity jurisdiction.

Who this affects

Windward Bora LLC must provide additional facts supporting diversity jurisdiction, particularly the citizenship of all members of Midland Funding LLC. The order concerns whether the federal court can exercise jurisdiction over the action; it does not decide the parties’ underlying claims.

What happened

Windward Bora LLC sued John Sotomayor and other defendants, claiming that the federal court had jurisdiction because the parties were citizens of different states.

The opinion states that Midland Funding LLC’s citizenship depends on the citizenship of all its members, but Windward Bora did not identify those members’ citizenships. The court therefore could not determine whether diversity jurisdiction existed.

Judge Seibel ordered Windward Bora to file a letter by 5:00 p.m. on February 21, 2023, explaining and supporting its claim that diversity jurisdiction exists. The order did not decide the underlying claims.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Windard Bora LLC v. Sotomayor · No. 7:21-cv-07161
Judge
Cathy Seibel
Date
Feb. 16, 2023

Background

Windward Bora LLC filed the action on August 25, 2021, against John Sotomayor, Alexandria Loaiza, American Express Centurion Bank, Midland Funding LLC doing business in New York as Midland Funding of Delaware, LLC, Capital One Bank (USA), N.A., and John and Jane Doe. Windward Bora alleged that the court had subject-matter jurisdiction based on diversity of citizenship under 28 U.S.C. § 1332. Diversity jurisdiction generally requires the parties to be citizens of different states.

Jurisdictional issue

The court explained that a limited liability company’s citizenship is based on the citizenship of all of its members. Windward Bora alleged that Midland Funding LLC was a citizen of California, but it did not allege the citizenship of Midland Funding LLC’s members. Because of that omission, the court could not determine whether Midland Funding LLC and Windward Bora were citizens of different states when the action was filed.

Order

Judge Cathy Seibel ordered Windward Bora to file a letter through the court’s electronic filing system by 5:00 p.m. on February 21, 2023. The letter must explain the basis for asserting diversity jurisdiction and provide factual support. The opinion does not rule on the underlying claims or state a final disposition of the action.

The authoritative version

Read the full 2-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.