Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled Feb. 22, 2023

Batista v. Made in Mexico Uptown Corp

Judge
James Oetken
Docket
1:21-cv-08606
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
5
EmploymentFlsaCivil ProcedureFee Petition
In one sentence

In Batista v. Made in Mexico Uptown Corp., Judge Oetken granted Batista’s default judgment for unpaid wages, interest, costs, and attorney’s fees.

Who this affects

Cynthia Batista received a default judgment against Made in Mexico Uptown Corp., Made in Mexico Harlem Corp., Henry Bourdier, and Ismael Garcia for the amounts ordered by the court.

What happened

In Batista v. Made in Mexico Uptown Corp., Cynthia Batista alleged that the defendants failed to pay her required minimum and overtime wages during her employment as a waitress or cashier. She alleged that she received only customer tips and was not paid wages for her hours worked.

The four defendants did not appear, answer, or otherwise respond to the lawsuit. After the court determined that Batista’s well-pleaded allegations established the defendants’ legal responsibility, it accepted her damages calculations.

Judge Oetken granted Batista’s motion for default judgment. The court awarded her $325,558.75, plus prejudgment interest at 9% per year from August 26, 2018, through the judgment date, and $3,679.00 in costs and reasonable attorney’s fees. The clerk was directed to enter judgment and close the case.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Batista v. Made in Mexico Uptown Corp · No. 1:21-cv-08606
Judge
James Oetken
Date
Feb. 22, 2023

Background

Cynthia Batista sued Made in Mexico Uptown Corp., Made in Mexico Harlem Corp., Henry Bourdier, and Ismael Garcia under the Fair Labor Standards Act and related provisions of New York law. She alleged that she worked for the defendants as a waitress or cashier from approximately April 2015 through July 2021. She primarily worked at Made in Mexico Uptown Corp. and also worked at Made in Mexico Harlem Corp. during various periods.

Batista alleged that the defendants did not pay her wages for her hours worked and that she received only tips from customers, totaling approximately $800 per week. She also alleged that the defendants failed to pay the required minimum wage and overtime wages, including for work exceeding 40 hours per week and for work exceeding 10 hours in a day. She alleged that the defendants did not keep records of her working time.

Default and liability

The corporate defendants were served on October 22, 2021, and the individual defendants were served before December 9, 2021. None of the defendants appeared, answered, or otherwise responded to the complaint. The clerk entered certificates of default against all four defendants on February 4, 2022. Batista later served her default-judgment papers again after the court identified a missing proof-of-service requirement, but the defendants still did not respond.

A default judgment is a judgment entered when a defendant fails to plead or otherwise defend. The court explained that a default generally admits the complaint’s well-pleaded factual allegations, but the court must still determine whether those allegations establish legal liability. Here, the court concluded that the allegations established the defendants’ liability as a matter of law.

Damages and ruling

Batista sought monetary relief and attorney’s fees, rather than the injunctive relief also requested in the complaint. The court found that her damages calculations were adequately and correctly based on the uncontested allegations about her work hours, work frequency, and lack of compensation.

Judge Oetken granted Batista’s motion for default judgment. The court awarded judgment against Made in Mexico Uptown Corp., Made in Mexico Harlem Corp., Henry Bourdier, and Ismael Garcia for $325,558.75, plus prejudgment interest at 9% per year from August 26, 2018, through the date of judgment, and $3,679.00 in costs and reasonable attorney’s fees. The clerk was directed to enter judgment, close the motion, and mark the case closed.

The authoritative version

Read the full 5-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.