Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled Feb. 24, 2023

Kameoka v. Tokyo Restaurants Factory, Inc.

Judge
Robert Lehrburger
Docket
1:22-cv-06427
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
2
FlsaEmploymentCivil Procedure
In one sentence

In Kameoka v. Tokyo Restaurants Factory, Judge Lehrburger approved the wage-settlement agreement and dismissed the entire case with prejudice.

Who this affects

Masateru Kameoka and Namiko Yamada, who brought the wage claims, and Tokyo Restaurants Factory, Inc., and the other defendants named in the case.

What happened

Masateru Kameoka and Namiko Yamada sued Tokyo Restaurants Factory, Inc., and other defendants for damages under the Fair Labor Standards Act and New York Labor Law.

The parties asked the court to approve their Fair Labor Standards Act settlement after two days of court-annexed mediation. They separately filed a confidential agreement resolving the New York Labor Law claim.

Judge Robert W. Lehrburger found the settlement fair and reasonable, approved it, and dismissed and discontinued the entire case with prejudice, without costs or fees except as provided in the settlement agreement.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Kameoka v. Tokyo Restaurants Factory, Inc. · No. 1:22-cv-06427
Judge
Robert Lehrburger
Date
Feb. 24, 2023

Background

Masateru Kameoka and Namiko Yamada brought an action for damages under the Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA), a federal wage-and-hour law, and the New York Labor Law (NYLL) against Tokyo Restaurants Factory, Inc., and other defendants. The parties jointly asked the court to approve their settlement of the FLSA claims. They separately filed a confidential settlement agreement concerning the NYLL claim. The agreements followed two days of court-annexed mediation with a neutral third party.

Court’s Review

The court explained that it had to determine whether the FLSA settlement was fair and reasonable and resulted from arm’s-length negotiations rather than employer overreaching. The court reviewed the FLSA Settlement Agreement, the separate NYLL agreement, and the parties’ letter. It considered the prior proceedings, the risks and costs of continuing the case, the possible recovery, the bargaining process, attorney’s fees, and the possibility of fraud or collusion. The court noted that the settlement had no confidentiality restrictions or non-disparagement provisions, released only wage-and-hour claims, and provided attorney’s fees within a fair and reasonable range.

Ruling

The court found the settlement fair and reasonable and approved it. Because the case was resolved by settlement, the court dismissed and discontinued it in its entirety, with prejudice, without costs or fees to any party except as provided in the settlement agreement. The Clerk of Court was directed to terminate all motions and deadlines and close the case.

The authoritative version

Read the full 2-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.