Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled Mar. 1, 2023

Dicks v. 1canoe2, LLC

Judge
Vyskocil
Docket
1:22-cv-07921
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
1
Civil Procedure
In one sentence

In Dicks v. 1canoe2, LLC, Judge Vyskocil set a deadline for seeking default judgment and warned that inaction may lead to dismissal.

Who this affects

Victoria Dicks and 1canoe2, LLC; the order required Dicks to seek default judgment by April 3, 2023 and warned that the action may be dismissed if she did not do so.

What happened

In Dicks v. 1canoe2, LLC, Victoria Dicks sued 1canoe2, LLC, and the defendant did not respond by the stated deadline. The Clerk issued a certificate of default on January 3, 2023.

The court noted that Dicks had taken no further action. It ordered that any motion for default judgment be filed by April 3, 2023, and warned that failing to meet the deadline may result in dismissal for failure to prosecute.

Judge Mary Kay Vyskocil did not enter a default judgment or dismiss the case in this order; she set the deadline and provided the warning.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Dicks v. 1canoe2, LLC · No. 1:22-cv-07921
Judge
Vyskocil
Date
Mar. 1, 2023

Background

Victoria Dicks filed the action on September 16, 2022, and an affidavit stated that 1canoe2, LLC had been served with the summons and complaint. The defendant's response was due October 28, 2022, but no response was filed. The Clerk issued a certificate of default against the defendant on January 3, 2023.

Order

The court stated that Dicks had taken no further action and had not prosecuted the case. It ordered that any motion for entry of a default judgment against the defendant be filed by April 3, 2023. The court directed Dicks to follow the procedures in the court's Individual Rules and Practices for Civil Cases.

Effect of the Order

The court warned that failure to move for default judgment by April 3, 2023, may result in dismissal of the action for failure to prosecute under Rule 41(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. This order set a deadline and warning; it did not itself grant default judgment or dismiss the action.

The authoritative version

Read the full 1-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.