Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled Mar. 6, 2023

Bassaw v. Clean Cause, Inc.

Judge
Vyskocil
Docket
1:22-cv-10995
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
1
Civil ProcedureClass Action
In one sentence

In Bassaw v. Clean Cause, Inc., Judge Vyskocil discontinued the case after a settlement in principle, allowing restoration by April 10, 2023.

Who this affects

Shivan Bassaw and Clean Cause, Inc.; the order also concerns the people Bassaw sought to represent as others similarly situated.

What happened

In Bassaw v. Clean Cause, Inc., Plaintiff Shivan Bassaw told the court that the parties had reached a settlement in principle.

The court ordered the case discontinued without costs to any party and without prejudice to restoring it to the court’s calendar if an application was made by April 10, 2023.

Judge Mary Kay Vyskocil stated that if no application to restore the case was made by that date, the dismissal would be with prejudice. All other dates and deadlines were adjourned indefinitely.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Bassaw v. Clean Cause, Inc. · No. 1:22-cv-10995
Judge
Vyskocil
Date
Mar. 6, 2023

Background

The court received a letter from Plaintiff Shivan Bassaw stating that the parties had reached a settlement in principle. The caption identifies Bassaw as proceeding individually and on behalf of others similarly situated.

Ruling

The court ordered that the case be discontinued without costs to any party. The order allowed either side to seek restoration of the case to the court’s calendar by April 10, 2023. The order stated that if no application to restore the case was made by that date, the dismissal would be with prejudice. All other dates and deadlines were adjourned indefinitely.

Effect

The order resolved the case based on the reported settlement in principle, without deciding the underlying claims. The opinion does not provide the settlement’s terms.

The authoritative version

Read the full 1-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.