Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled Mar. 6, 2023

Bell Semiconductor, LLC v. ASMedia Technology, Inc.

Judge
Valerie Caproni
Docket
1:22-cv-09260
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
2
Civil ProcedureIntellectual Property
In one sentence

In Bell Semiconductor v. ASMedia, Judge Caproni granted ASMedia’s motion to seal redactions protecting unit-sales and customer information.

Who this affects

ASMedia Technology, Inc., whose confidential unit-sales and customer information was protected from public disclosure; Bell Semiconductor, LLC, which consented to redacting the company name in the proposed text.

What happened

In Bell Semiconductor, LLC v. ASMedia Technology, Inc., ASMedia asked to file redacted versions of its motion-to-dismiss memorandum and a supporting declaration by Jerry Wang. The requested redactions concerned specific unit-sales information and a specific customer.

ASMedia argued that disclosure could cause permanent competitive harm because competitors could use the information. Bell Semiconductor consented to redacting the company name in the proposed text.

Judge Caproni granted ASMedia’s motion to seal, adopting the reasoning from an earlier order that allowed ASMedia to seal the same information. The ruling permitted the requested protection for confidential business information.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Bell Semiconductor, LLC v. ASMedia Technology, Inc. · No. 1:22-cv-09260
Judge
Valerie Caproni
Date
Mar. 6, 2023

Background

ASMedia Technology, Inc. asked the court for permission to file redacted versions of its memorandum supporting a motion to dismiss and a declaration by Jerry Wang. The proposed redactions concerned specific unit-sales information and the identity of a specific customer associated with those sales. Bell Semiconductor, LLC consented to redacting the company name in the text identified by ASMedia.

Reasoning

ASMedia argued that the information was sensitive commercial information and that competitors could use it to cause competitive injury. The application cited decisions recognizing that confidential business information may be sealed when disclosure could harm a party’s competitive strategy. The court’s order states that it adopted the same reasoning used in an earlier order granting ASMedia’s motion to seal the same information.

Disposition

The court granted ASMedia’s motion to seal the requested information and ordered that the proposed redacted versions could be filed. Judge Valerie E. Caproni signed the order.

The authoritative version

Read the full 2-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.