Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled Mar. 8, 2023

Telebrands Corp. v. Shenzhen Yitai Technology Co., Ltd.

Judge
Lorna Schofield
Docket
1:22-cv-00904
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
2
Civil Procedure
In one sentence

Telebrands v. Shenzhen Yitai: Judge Schofield adopted the damages recommendation and awarded Telebrands $114,221.29 plus post-judgment interest.

Who this affects

Telebrands Corp. received an award of $114,221.29 in damages plus post-judgment interest. Shenzhen Yitai Technology Co., Ltd. was the defendant against which the award was entered.

What happened

In Telebrands Corp. v. Shenzhen Yitai Technology Co., Ltd., the court considered damages after an earlier final default judgment and permanent injunction had been entered for Telebrands.

Magistrate Judge James L. Cott recommended awarding Telebrands $114,221.29 in damages plus post-judgment interest. The opinion states that Shenzhen Yitai was served with the recommendation and did not timely object.

Judge Schofield found no clear error, adopted the recommendation in full, and awarded Telebrands $114,221.29 plus post-judgment interest under federal law.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Telebrands Corp. v. Shenzhen Yitai Technology Co., Ltd. · No. 1:22-cv-00904
Judge
Lorna Schofield
Date
Mar. 8, 2023

Background

A final default judgment and permanent injunction issued on May 5, 2022, granted judgment to Telebrands Corp. against Shenzhen Yitai Technology Co., Ltd. The court then referred Telebrands's request for damages to Magistrate Judge James L. Cott for a post-judgment inquest, meaning a proceeding to determine the amount of damages after the default judgment.

Report and Recommendation

On January 3, 2023, Judge Cott issued a Report and Recommendation proposing that Telebrands receive $114,221.29 in damages, plus post-judgment interest. The report allowed the parties 14 days after service to file objections. Telebrands filed proof that the report was served on Shenzhen Yitai on January 3, 2023, and no timely objections were filed.

Ruling

Because no timely objections were filed, Judge Schofield reviewed the record for clear error. The court found no clear error in Judge Cott's recommendations and ordered that the Report and Recommendation be adopted in full. Telebrands was awarded $114,221.29 in damages, plus post-judgment interest under 28 U.S.C. § 1961(a).

The authoritative version

Read the full 2-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.