All Glass S.R.L. v. Arglass Yamamura SE, LLC
- Vyskocil
- 1:22-cv-07863
- U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
- 1
In All Glass S.R.L. v. Arglass Yamamura SE, Judge Vyskocil discontinued the settled action, allowing restoration by April 10, 2023.
All Glass S.R.L. and Arglass Yamamura SE, LLC; the action was discontinued based on the parties’ reported settlement in principle.
What happened
In All Glass S.R.L. v. Arglass Yamamura SE, the parties jointly told the court they had reached a settlement in principle.
The court discontinued the action without costs to either party and without prejudice to restoring it to the court’s calendar if the parties could not put their settlement in writing.
Judge Mary Kay Vyskocil set April 10, 2023, as the deadline to seek restoration. If no application was made by then, the dismissal would be with prejudice.
The detailed version
- All Glass S.R.L. v. Arglass Yamamura SE, LLC · No. 1:22-cv-07863
- Vyskocil
- Mar. 8, 2023
Background The parties jointly informed the court that they had reached a settlement in principle. The opinion does not describe the underlying claims or the settlement’s terms.
Ruling The court ordered that the action be discontinued without costs to any party and without prejudice to restoring the action to the court’s calendar if the parties were unable to memorialize their settlement in writing. Any application to restore the action had to be made by April 10, 2023. The order stated that if no application was made by that date, the dismissal of the action would be with prejudice.
Effect The order resolved the case based on the parties’ reported settlement in principle rather than deciding the underlying dispute. It did not award costs to either party.
Read the full 1-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.