Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled Mar. 9, 2023

Hollis v. The All American Bar on First, Inc.

Judge
Rearden
Docket
1:22-cv-01466
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
1
Civil Procedure
In one sentence

In Hollis v. The All American Bar on First, Judge Rearden approved the parties’ joint request to extend their settlement-filing deadline to March 17, 2023.

Who this affects

The parties to the settlement—Ellen Hollis and the defendants identified in the case caption—were affected by the extended deadline for submitting their settlement agreement.

What happened

In Hollis v. The All American Bar on First, the plaintiff and defendants jointly asked the court for more time to submit their settlement agreement for judicial approval. The request concerned a deadline of March 3, 2023.

The parties said they were still finalizing the agreement and expected to submit it soon. They asked to extend the deadline by two weeks, to March 17, 2023.

The court ordered the requested extension. Judge Jennifer H. Rearden signed the order on March 9, 2023.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Hollis v. The All American Bar on First, Inc. · No. 1:22-cv-01466
Judge
Rearden
Date
Mar. 9, 2023

Background

The plaintiff’s law firm submitted a letter jointly with the defendants. The parties said they were finalizing a settlement agreement and asked to extend the deadline for submitting that agreement to the court for approval. The letter cited Cheeks v. Freeport Pancake House, Inc., which concerns judicial approval of certain wage-and-hour settlements.

Request

The parties requested a two-week extension, changing the deadline from March 3, 2023, to March 17, 2023. They stated that they expected to submit the settlement agreement shortly.

Ruling

The court ordered the requested extension. The excerpt does not provide additional reasoning or address the merits of the underlying dispute.

The authoritative version

Read the full 1-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.