Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled Mar. 15, 2023

Cheng v. Mautz

Judge
Gregory Woods
Docket
1:23-cv-02151
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
5
Civil ProcedurePro Se
In one sentence

In Cheng v. Mautz, Judge Swain ordered payment or an application to proceed without prepaying fees within 30 days.

Who this affects

Sheng-Wen Cheng, who filed the action without a lawyer and was incarcerated, must either pay the required fees or submit the specified application and authorization within 30 days to avoid dismissal of the action.

What happened

Sheng-Wen Cheng v. Jeremy Mautz concerns a civil case filed without a lawyer by Cheng, who was incarcerated. Cheng submitted the complaint without paying the required fees or completing the forms needed to request permission to proceed without prepaying them.

The court gave Cheng 30 days to either pay $402 in fees or submit a completed application and authorization allowing installment deductions from his prison account. The court said the case would be processed if Cheng complied and would be dismissed if he did not.

Chief Judge Laura Taylor Swain issued the order on March 15, 2023. She also ruled that an appeal from the order would not qualify for fee-free status because it would not be taken in good faith.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Cheng v. Mautz · No. 1:23-cv-02151
Judge
Gregory Woods
Date
Mar. 15, 2023

Background

Sheng-Wen Cheng filed this civil action without a lawyer while incarcerated at Federal Correction Institution Sandstone. Cheng submitted the complaint without paying the filing fees and without submitting a completed application to proceed without prepaying fees or a prisoner authorization.

What the Court Ordered

The court explained that a prisoner filing a civil action must either pay $402 in fees—a $350 filing fee and a $52 administrative fee—or request permission to proceed without prepaying fees by submitting a signed application and prisoner authorization. If that request is granted, the $350 filing fee must still be collected in installments from the prisoner's account. The authorization also directs the correctional facility to provide certified account statements for the previous six months and deduct the required payments.

Within 30 days of the order, Cheng was required to either pay the $402 or submit the completed application and prisoner authorization, labeled with docket number 23-CV-2151 (LTS). The court stated that no answer from the defendant was required at that time. If Cheng complied, the case would be processed under the Clerk's Office procedures; if Cheng failed to comply within the allowed time, the action would be dismissed.

Additional Ruling

Chief Judge Laura Taylor Swain certified under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3) that any appeal from the order would not be taken in good faith and denied fee-free status for purposes of an appeal. The order itself did not decide the underlying claims against Jeremy Mautz.

Classification Basis

This is a procedural order addressing payment of filing fees and an application to proceed without prepaying them. It does not resolve the merits of Cheng's claims.

The authoritative version

Read the full 5-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.