Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled Mar. 16, 2023

Reyes v. Tru by Mur, Inc.

Judge
Analisa Torres
Docket
1:22-cv-08599
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
2
FlsaEmploymentCivil Procedure
In one sentence

In Reyes v. Tru by Mur, Judge Torres transferred the employment case to the Eastern District of New York because the events occurred there.

Who this affects

The transfer affects Laidi Reyes, Carlos Roberto Reyes, Victor Manuel Sanchez, Tru by Mur, Inc., and Igor Fazylov by moving the pending action from the Southern District of New York to the Eastern District of New York. The order did not decide the parties' underlying wage claims.

What happened

Reyes v. Tru by Mur, Inc. concerns claims by Laidi Reyes, Carlos Roberto Reyes, and Victor Manuel Sanchez under the Fair Labor Standards Act and New York Labor Law against Tru by Mur, Inc. and Igor Fazylov.

During mediation, the parties learned that the relevant events occurred in Nassau County, where the restaurant was located. The parties jointly requested transfer, and the defendants supported moving the case because additional defendants the plaintiffs intended to add lived in the Eastern District of New York.

Judge Analisa Torres granted the transfer request and directed the Clerk to transfer the action to the Eastern District of New York. The order did not decide whether the plaintiffs' wage claims were valid.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Reyes v. Tru by Mur, Inc. · No. 1:22-cv-08599
Judge
Analisa Torres
Date
Mar. 16, 2023

Background

The plaintiffs brought claims under the Fair Labor Standards Act, a federal wage-and-hour law, and the New York Labor Law. They sued Tru by Mur, Inc. and Igor Fazylov in the Southern District of New York.

During mediation, the plaintiffs learned that the underlying facts took place in Nassau County. They told the court that the case should have been filed in the Eastern District of New York and that they intended to seek permission to amend the complaint to add parties who lived there. The defendants' position, as reported in the plaintiffs' letter, was that the case should be transferred because the additional defendants the plaintiffs intended to name lived in the Eastern District.

Transfer Analysis

The court explained that federal law allows a case to be transferred for the convenience of the parties and witnesses and in the interest of justice. It considered the relevant transfer factors, including the convenience of witnesses and parties, the location of the events, access to evidence, the parties' resources, the plaintiff's choice of forum, trial efficiency, and the interests of justice.

The court found transfer appropriate because the parties jointly requested it. The plaintiffs' claims arose from their employment at Tru by Mur, a restaurant in Lawrence, New York, in Nassau County and the Eastern District. The court concluded that the key events occurred there and that relevant witnesses, documents, and other evidence were likely to be there. It also stated that the defendants resided in the Eastern District, making venue proper there.

Ruling

Judge Analisa Torres ordered the Clerk of Court to transfer the action to the United States District Court for the Eastern District of New York. The order addressed the location of the case only; it did not resolve the merits of the plaintiffs' wage claims.

The authoritative version

Read the full 2-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.