Cala v. Buena Vista Tortillas Corp.
- James Oetken
- 1:21-cv-06890
- U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
- 4
In Cala v. Buena Vista Tortillas Corp., Judge Oetken granted default judgment for unpaid wages, awarding Cala more than $140,000 plus fees, costs, and interest.
Edwin Cala received a default judgment against Buena Vista Tortillas Corp., Noe Baltazar, and Michaela Vargas for alleged unpaid wages and related amounts. The defendants are subject to the monetary judgment, interest, fees, costs, and possible 15% increase described in the order.
What happened
In Cala v. Buena Vista Tortillas Corp., Edwin Cala alleged that Buena Vista Tortillas Corp., Noe Baltazar, and Michaela Vargas failed to pay required minimum and overtime wages and other amounts under federal and New York law. He said he worked long hours as a package worker and was paid in cash without receiving required wage notices or accurate wage statements.
The defendants did not defend the case, and the court entered defaults against all three. Cala then requested default judgment, supported by an affidavit describing his hours and calculating his damages and legal fees. The court accepted the well-supported allegations as true and found that they established the defendants’ legal responsibility.
Judge Oetken granted the motion for default judgment and directed the Clerk to enter judgment and close the case. The award includes $140,693 for compensatory and permitted additional damages and prejudgment interest, $2,645.50 in attorney’s fees, $627 in costs, post-judgment interest, and a possible 15% increase if the judgment remains unpaid after the specified period.
The detailed version
- Cala v. Buena Vista Tortillas Corp. · No. 1:21-cv-06890
- James Oetken
- Mar. 20, 2023
Background
Edwin Cala sued Buena Vista Tortillas Corp., Noe Baltazar, and Michaela Vargas under the Fair Labor Standards Act and New York Labor Law. He alleged that the defendants jointly employed him as a package worker from November 2017 through July 22, 2021. According to the amended complaint, he regularly worked more than 40 hours per week, was paid in cash, and was not paid the required minimum wage or overtime rate. He also alleged that the defendants failed to provide required notices about wages, overtime, pay rates, and paydays, and did not provide accurate wage statements.
The amended complaint alleged that Baltazar and Vargas owned or controlled the factory, determined employee wages and hours, and had hiring and firing authority. The complaint was served on the corporate defendant on September 16, 2021, and on Vargas and Baltazar on September 30, 2021. The Clerk entered certificates of default against all three defendants on May 26, 2022. Cala moved for default judgment and served the motion and supporting papers on the defendants.
Court’s analysis
A default occurs when a party fails to plead or otherwise defend. For a default judgment, the court generally accepts the opposing party’s well-pleaded factual allegations as true, but it must still determine whether those allegations establish legal responsibility. The court applies the same pleading standard used for a motion to dismiss when deciding whether the allegations are sufficiently supported.
The court accepted Cala’s complaint allegations as true. It also considered his affidavit supporting the number of hours worked, damages calculations, and attorney’s-fee request. The court found those materials reasonable under the Fair Labor Standards Act and New York Labor Law and concluded that the allegations established the defendants’ liability as a matter of law.
Ruling
Judge J. Paul Oetken granted Cala’s motion for default judgment. The relief awarded was:
- $140,693.00, including compensatory damages, permitted liquidated damages, and prejudgment interest, calculated as provided in 28 U.S.C. § 1961(a); - $2,645.50 in attorney’s fees and $627.00 in costs, calculated as provided in 28 U.S.C. § 1961(a); - Post-judgment interest calculated under 28 U.S.C. § 1961; and - An automatic 15% increase in the total judgment if amounts remain unpaid after the period specified in the order, as required by New York Labor Law § 198(4).
The court directed the Clerk to enter judgment, close the motion, and close the case.
Read the full 4-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.