Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled Mar. 20, 2023

Amerisourcebergen Corporation v. Warrior Freight Systems LLC

Judge
Lewis Liman
Docket
1:22-cv-05251
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
1
Civil ProcedureContract
In one sentence

In AmerisourceBergen v. Warrior Freight, Judge Liman granted transfer to the Eastern District of Pennsylvania under the parties’ forum-selection clause.

Who this affects

AmerisourceBergen Corporation and Warrior Freight Systems LLC; the case was transferred from the Southern District of New York to the Eastern District of Pennsylvania.

What happened

AmerisourceBergen Corporation sued Warrior Freight Systems LLC. AmerisourceBergen asked to move the case from the Southern District of New York to the Eastern District of Pennsylvania, and Warrior Freight had not appeared or opposed the request.

The parties’ contract said proceedings arising from the agreement would be heard only in the courts of Chester County, Pennsylvania, or the Eastern District of Pennsylvania. The court found no extraordinary public-interest reason to keep the case in New York.

Judge Lewis J. Liman granted AmerisourceBergen’s motion to transfer. He directed the clerk to transfer the case to the Eastern District of Pennsylvania.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Amerisourcebergen Corporation v. Warrior Freight Systems LLC · No. 1:22-cv-05251
Judge
Lewis Liman
Date
Mar. 20, 2023

Background

AmerisourceBergen Corporation sued Warrior Freight Systems LLC. AmerisourceBergen moved under 28 U.S.C. § 1404(a), a statute that permits a federal court to transfer a civil case for the convenience of the parties and witnesses and in the interest of justice. Warrior Freight had not appeared, and the motion was unopposed.

Forum-selection clause

The contract between the parties provided that any proceeding arising from the agreement would be heard solely in the courts of Chester County, Pennsylvania, or the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania. The court applied the rule that a valid forum-selection clause ordinarily requires transfer to the chosen forum unless extraordinary circumstances unrelated to the parties’ convenience justify denying the transfer.

Ruling

The court identified no public-interest factors that made the case extraordinary or warranted retaining it in the Southern District of New York. The court therefore granted AmerisourceBergen’s motion to transfer and directed the clerk to transfer the case to the Eastern District of Pennsylvania.

The authoritative version

Read the full 1-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.