Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled Mar. 21, 2023

Hernandez v. Montagari

Judge
Laura Swain
Docket
1:23-cv-02043
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
2
HabeasPro SeCivil Procedure
In one sentence

In Hernandez v. Montagari, Judge Swain ordered payment or an IFP application before processing the habeas petition.

Who this affects

Roberto Bacallao Hernandez was required to pay the $5 filing fee or submit a signed application to proceed without prepayment within 30 days; failure to comply would result in dismissal of the action.

What happened

In Hernandez v. Montagari, Roberto Bacallao Hernandez filed a petition asking the court to review his custody, but he did not pay the $5 filing fee or submit an application to proceed without paying it upfront.

The court gave Hernandez 30 days from March 21, 2023, to pay the fee or submit a signed application to proceed without prepayment. No response from A. Montagari was required at that time.

Judge Laura Taylor Swain ordered that the case would be processed if Hernandez complied and dismissed if he did not. She also denied permission to proceed without prepaying fees for any appeal from this order.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Hernandez v. Montagari · No. 1:23-cv-02043
Judge
Laura Swain
Date
Mar. 21, 2023

Background

Roberto Bacallao Hernandez, who was representing himself, filed a petition for a court remedy concerning custody. The opinion states that a petitioner must either pay the $5 filing fee or submit a signed application to proceed without prepaying fees. Hernandez submitted the petition without either the fee or an application.

Order

The court ordered Hernandez, within 30 days of the order, to do one of two things: pay the $5 filing fee or complete and submit the attached application to proceed without prepayment. The application was to include docket number 23-CV-2043 (LTS). The court explained that, if it granted the application, Hernandez could proceed without prepaying fees.

No response from A. Montagari was required at that time. If Hernandez complied, the Clerk’s Office would process the case under its procedures. If he failed to comply within the allowed time, the action would be dismissed.

Disposition

This order did not decide the substance of Hernandez’s petition. The court certified that an appeal from the order would not be taken in good faith and denied permission to proceed without prepaying fees for purposes of an appeal.

The authoritative version

Read the full 2-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.