Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled Mar. 24, 2023

Lowe v. U.S. Department of Justice

Judge
John Cronan
Docket
1:23-cv-01593
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
3
Civil ProcedurePro Se
In one sentence

In Lowe v. U.S. Department of Justice, Judge Cronan ordered Marshals service and denied fee-free appeal status.

Who this affects

Kevin Lowe and the U.S. Department of Justice, Office of Information Policy; the order also directs the Clerk of Court and the U.S. Marshals Service to carry out service.

What happened

In Lowe v. U.S. Department of Justice, Kevin Lowe, a federal prisoner on home confinement, brought a lawsuit under the Freedom of Information Act without a lawyer.

The court had allowed Lowe to proceed without prepaying filing fees. It directed the court clerk to prepare the paperwork for the U.S. Marshals Service to serve the U.S. Department of Justice, Office of Information Policy.

Judge Cronan also stated that any appeal would not be taken in good faith and denied permission to appeal without prepaying fees. The order did not decide the underlying Freedom of Information Act dispute.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Lowe v. U.S. Department of Justice · No. 1:23-cv-01593
Judge
John Cronan
Date
Mar. 24, 2023

Background

Kevin Lowe, who the opinion identifies as a federal prisoner on home confinement, filed this action without a lawyer under the Freedom of Information Act, a federal law that allows people to request records from federal agencies. The defendant is the U.S. Department of Justice, Office of Information Policy.

In an order dated March 21, 2023, the court granted Lowe permission to proceed without prepaying filing fees.

Service of the Lawsuit

Because Lowe was proceeding without prepaying fees, the court directed the Clerk of Court to prepare a U.S. Marshals Service Process Receipt and Return form for the defendant. The clerk was instructed to mark the form for service on the United States, issue a summons, and provide the Marshals Service with a copy of the order and the other paperwork needed to serve the United States.

The order states that Lowe is responsible for ensuring service within 90 days after the summons is issued and for requesting an extension if needed. It also requires him to notify the court in writing if his address changes and states that the court may dismiss the action if he fails to do so.

Ruling

The court ordered the clerk to prepare the service form, mark it for service on the United States, issue the summons, and deliver the required materials to the Marshals Service. The court also certified that any appeal from the order would not be taken in good faith and denied permission to appeal without prepaying fees. The order did not address the merits of Lowe's Freedom of Information Act claims.

The authoritative version

Read the full 3-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.