Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled Mar. 28, 2023

Page v. U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services

Judge
Rearden
Docket
1:23-cv-00254
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
1
ImmigrationCivil Procedure
In one sentence

In Page v. Jaddou, Judge Rearden ordered a 120-day stay while USCIS reviews evidence for the plaintiffs’ status applications.

Who this affects

The plaintiffs seeking adjudication of their Form I-485 applications and the government defendants, including USCIS.

What happened

Page, et al. v. Jaddou, et al. is a case in which the plaintiffs asked the court to require U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services to decide their applications to adjust their immigration status.

USCIS had issued the plaintiffs a request for missing evidence. The plaintiffs had until June 12, 2023, to respond, after which USCIS said it needed time to review the response and decide the applications. The parties jointly requested a stay from March 31 through July 31, 2023.

Judge Jennifer H. Rearden ordered the requested stay. The parties proposed providing a status update or filing a proposed dismissal by July 31, 2023.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Page v. U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services · No. 1:23-cv-00254
Judge
Rearden
Date
Mar. 28, 2023

Background

The plaintiffs asked the court to compel U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) to adjudicate an Application to Adjust Status, Form I-485. The government represented the defendants.

On March 16, 2023, USCIS issued the plaintiffs a Request for Evidence seeking information required to process the application. The plaintiffs had until June 12, 2023, to submit their response. USCIS stated that, after receiving the response, it would need time to review the materials and adjudicate the application.

Parties’ Request

The parties jointly requested a 120-day stay of the case, from March 31, 2023, through July 31, 2023. They stated that the case might be resolved without further court intervention and that a stay would conserve judicial and party resources. They also described the request as their first request for a stay.

Ruling

The court ordered the requested stay. The parties proposed providing a joint status update or filing a stipulation and proposed order of dismissal by July 31, 2023. Judge Jennifer H. Rearden entered the order on March 28, 2023.

The authoritative version

Read the full 1-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.