Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled Mar. 29, 2023

Sejdija v. First Quality Maintenance, L.P.

Judge
Robert Lehrburger
Docket
1:22-cv-04487
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
2
FlsaCivil Procedure
In one sentence

In Sejdija v. First Quality Maintenance, Judge Lehrburger approved the FLSA settlement and dismissed the case with prejudice.

Who this affects

Ekrem Sejdija and the defendants, including First Quality Maintenance, L.P. and VBG 990 AOA LLC. The entire case was dismissed and discontinued with prejudice under the approved settlement.

What happened

In Sejdija v. First Quality Maintenance, L.P., the plaintiff brought claims for damages under the Fair Labor Standards Act and New York Labor Law. The parties jointly asked the court to approve their settlement.

Judge Lehrburger reviewed the agreement and the parties’ submission, including the risks and costs of continuing the case, possible recovery, attorney’s fees, and potential fraud or collusion. The agreement had no confidentiality or non-disparagement provisions, included a narrow release, and provided attorney’s fees that the court found acceptable.

Judge Lehrburger found the settlement fair and reasonable and approved it. Because the case was resolved by settlement, the court dismissed and discontinued the entire case with prejudice, without costs or fees to either party except as provided in the settlement agreement.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Sejdija v. First Quality Maintenance, L.P. · No. 1:22-cv-04487
Judge
Robert Lehrburger
Date
Mar. 29, 2023

Background

Ekrem Sejdija brought an action for damages under the Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA), a federal wage-and-hour law, and the New York Labor Law against First Quality Maintenance, L.P., and other defendants. The parties submitted a joint request for approval of their settlement agreement. The agreement was preceded by a stipulation from Defendant VBG 990 AOA LLC to refrain from enforcing a housing court judgment against Sejdija and his family; the opinion states that this stipulation was a condition of the settlement agreement.

Settlement review

The court explained that it had to determine whether the FLSA settlement was fair and reasonable, resulted from arm’s-length negotiations, and did not reflect employer overreaching. The court reviewed the settlement agreement and the parties’ letter. It considered the prior proceedings, the parties’ participation in the District’s Mediation Program, the risks, burdens, and costs of continuing the case, the possible recovery, the nature of the negotiations, attorney’s fees, and the possibility of fraud or collusion.

The court also noted that the agreement contained no confidentiality restrictions, no non-disparagement provision, and a narrowly tailored release. It found that the attorney’s fees were within a fair, reasonable, and acceptable range.

Ruling

The court found the settlement agreement fair and reasonable and approved it. Because the case had been resolved by settlement, Judge Robert W. Lehrburger ordered that the case be dismissed and discontinued in its entirety, with prejudice, without costs or fees to any party except as provided in the settlement agreement. The clerk was requested to terminate all motions and deadlines and close the case.

The authoritative version

Read the full 2-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.