Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled Mar. 30, 2023

Bermejo Sanango v. Ruby Nails Tarrytown, Inc.

Judge
Philip Halpern
Docket
7:20-cv-08245
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
14
EmploymentFlsaCivil ProcedureFee Petition
In one sentence

Bermejo Sanango v. Ruby Nails: Judge Halpern entered a default judgment against Ruby Nail and dismissed claims against Kal for failure to prosecute.

Who this affects

Maria Concepcion Bermejo Sanango received a default judgment against Ruby Nails Tarrytown, Inc. The claims against Mi Young Kal were dismissed for failure to prosecute, and Edwin Keh had previously been voluntarily dismissed.

What happened

In Bermejo Sanango v. Ruby Nails Tarrytown, Inc., Maria Concepcion Bermejo Sanango claimed that Ruby Nail and others failed to pay minimum wage, overtime, and other required wages under federal and New York law, and failed to provide required wage records.

The court entered a default judgment against Ruby Nail because it did not defend the case. It awarded Bermejo Sanango $140,531.28 in wages and statutory damages, plus $21,130 in attorneys’ fees and $800.82 in costs, for a total of $162,462.10, along with pre- and post-judgment interest.

Judge Philip M. Halpern also dismissed the claims against Mi Young Kal because Bermejo Sanango did not pursue them or comply with the court’s orders. The court directed the clerk to enter judgment against Ruby Nail and close the case.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Bermejo Sanango v. Ruby Nails Tarrytown, Inc. · No. 7:20-cv-08245
Judge
Philip Halpern
Date
Mar. 30, 2023

Background

Maria Concepcion Bermejo Sanango sued Ruby Nails Tarrytown, Inc., doing business as Ruby Nail, Mi Young Kal, and Edwin Keh under the Fair Labor Standards Act and New York Labor Law. She alleged that the defendants failed to pay minimum wages, overtime, and spread-of-hours pay, and failed to provide required wage notices and wage statements.

The defendants initially answered through counsel. Their counsel later withdrew after Kal’s anticipated bankruptcy filing. The court warned that Ruby Nail, as a corporation, could appear in federal court only through a licensed attorney. The clerk later entered defaults against Ruby Nail, Kal, and Keh. Bermejo Sanango eventually sought a default judgment only against Ruby Nail. She voluntarily dismissed Keh, and the court granted that dismissal.

Default judgment against Ruby Nail

The court granted Bermejo Sanango’s motion for default judgment against Ruby Nail. A default established Ruby Nail’s liability on the well-pleaded claims, but Bermejo Sanango still had to provide evidence supporting the amount of damages. Because Ruby Nail did not produce time records, the court accepted Bermejo Sanango’s detailed estimates of her hours and pay.

The court awarded $65,265.64 in unpaid wages under New York law, consisting of:

- $4,013.84 for the difference between wages paid and the New York minimum wage; - $41,170.22 in unpaid overtime wages; and - $20,081.58 in spread-of-hours pay.

The court awarded an additional $65,265.64 in liquidated damages, equal to 100% of the unpaid wages. It also awarded $10,000 in statutory damages for alleged violations involving wage notices and wage statements: $5,000 for each type of violation.

The principal award was therefore $140,531.28. The court also awarded pre-judgment interest at 9% per year on the $65,265.64 in unpaid wages, beginning October 4, 2014, through entry of final judgment. Post-judgment interest was also authorized at the statutory rate.

Attorneys’ fees and costs

Bermejo Sanango requested $45,719 in attorneys’ fees and $800.02 in costs. The court found the requested hourly rates excessive, citing the law firm’s handling of the case, including failures related to the first default-judgment motion, delays in prosecuting the case, and failures concerning Kal. The court reduced the hourly rates and awarded $21,130 in attorneys’ fees and $800.82 in costs.

Dismissal of claims against Kal

The court dismissed the action against Kal under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b), which permits dismissal for failure to prosecute or failure to comply with court orders. After the stay related to Kal’s bankruptcy was lifted, Bermejo Sanango did not seek a default judgment against Kal or voluntarily dismiss her, despite a court order giving her those alternatives and setting a deadline. The court directed the clerk to terminate Kal as a defendant and close the case.

Disposition

Judge Philip M. Halpern directed the clerk to enter a default judgment against Ruby Nail in favor of Bermejo Sanango for $162,462.10 in principal damages, attorneys’ fees, and costs, plus the specified pre- and post-judgment interest. The action against Kal was dismissed under Rule 41(b), and the case was closed.

The authoritative version

Read the full 14-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.