Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled Mar. 30, 2023

Flemmings v. American International Group, Inc.

Judge
Paul Engelmayer
Docket
1:20-cv-00175
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
1
Civil Procedure
In one sentence

Flemmings v. American International Group: Judge Engelmayer dismissed the case without prejudice because Flemmings failed to prosecute it.

Who this affects

Stokely Flemmings’s case was dismissed without prejudice, and the clerk was directed to close the case. The defendants had not been served.

What happened

In Flemmings v. American International Group, Inc., Stokely Flemmings filed a complaint on January 8, 2020, but did not serve the defendants.

The court ordered Flemmings to explain by February 10, 2023, why the defendants had not been served on time. Flemmings neither served the defendants nor showed good cause, and the case otherwise made no progress.

Judge Paul Engelmayer dismissed the case without prejudice for failure to prosecute under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b) and the court’s inherent power. The clerk was directed to close the case.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Flemmings v. American International Group, Inc. · No. 1:20-cv-00175
Judge
Paul Engelmayer
Date
Mar. 30, 2023

Background

Stokely Flemmings filed the complaint on January 8, 2020. The defendants were not served.

Order to Show Cause

On January 30, 2023, the court ordered Flemmings to explain by February 10, 2023, why service had not been completed on time. Flemmings did not serve the defendants, did not show good cause for the failure to serve them, and made no other progress in the case.

Ruling

The court dismissed the case without prejudice for failure to prosecute under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b) and the court’s inherent power. A dismissal without prejudice does not bar refiling based on the dismissal itself. The clerk was directed to close the case.

The authoritative version

Read the full 1-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.