Strike 3 Holdings, LLC v. Doe
- Gabriel Gorenstein
- 1:23-cv-02194
- U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
- 4
Strike 3 Holdings v. Doe: Judge Gorenstein allowed a limited subpoena to identify the anonymous subscriber accused of movie downloading.
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC may seek the name and address of the anonymous subscriber associated with the specified Internet Protocol address. The subscriber may challenge or seek to modify the subpoena within 60 days after receiving notice, and Spectrum must preserve the information while a timely challenge is pending. The order also restricts public disclosure of identifying information.
What happened
In Strike 3 Holdings, LLC v. Doe, Strike 3 asked to subpoena Spectrum before the parties’ required planning conference. The complaint alleges that the subscriber linked to a specified Internet Protocol address illegally downloaded or distributed movies, but the subscriber’s name and address were unknown.
The court granted the motion to the extent stated. Strike 3 may seek only the subscriber’s name and address, and Spectrum must first send the subscriber the subpoena, complaint, and court-approved notice. The subscriber then has 60 days to ask the court to cancel or change the subpoena; identifying information must remain protected unless the court orders its release.
Judge Gabriel W. Gorenstein also ordered that the case continue under “John Doe” unless the court later directs otherwise. The order does not decide whether the alleged downloading or distribution occurred; it sets procedures for potentially identifying and notifying the subscriber.
The detailed version
- Strike 3 Holdings, LLC v. Doe · No. 1:23-cv-02194
- Gabriel Gorenstein
- Mar. 31, 2023
Background
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC sued a defendant identified as “John Doe,” described as the subscriber assigned Internet Protocol address 72.226.65.157. The complaint alleges that the subscriber illegally downloaded and/or distributed movies in digital form. Strike 3 did not know the defendant’s actual name or address and moved for permission to serve Spectrum with a subpoena before the parties’ Rule 26(f) conference, the meeting ordinarily used to plan discovery.
Ruling
The court granted the motion to the extent stated in the order. Within 14 days, Strike 3 may serve Spectrum with a subpoena under Rule 45 seeking only John Doe’s name and address. The subpoena must include the complaint, the order, and a court-approved “Notice to Subscriber.” Strike 3 may not seek other information, including a telephone number or email address.
Within 60 days after receiving the subpoena, Spectrum must send the subpoena, complaint, order, and notice to the subscriber or subscribers it determines are associated with the specified Internet Protocol address. Spectrum must tell Strike 3 when and how it delivered the materials and any information it has about whether they were received. Spectrum may not disclose the subscriber’s name or address to Strike 3 unless the court later permits it.
After delivery, the subscriber has 60 days to ask the court to quash, meaning cancel, or modify the subpoena. Spectrum must preserve the subpoenaed information while any timely challenge is pending. If the 60-day challenge period expires without a challenge, Strike 3 may notify the court and request an order requiring Spectrum to release the information. The order states that the court expects to direct release within 21 days after that request, although Spectrum may file its own motion to quash during the relevant periods.
Confidentiality and case status
Any information ultimately disclosed may be used only to protect Strike 3’s rights described in the complaint. The case must remain in the name of “John Doe” unless the court orders otherwise. Strike 3 may not publicly file identifying information, must file documents containing it in redacted form with unredacted versions under seal, and may not disclose the information to others.
The notice states that the subscriber does not have to answer the complaint at this stage. It explains that, if the subscriber does not challenge the subpoena, Strike 3 may obtain the name and address and serve the complaint. The order concerns pretrial identification and notice procedures; it does not decide the truth of the allegations or the merits of Strike 3’s claims. Judge Gabriel W. Gorenstein issued the order.
Read the full 4-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.