Pitt v. County of Rockland
- Vincent Briccetti
- 7:22-cv-08356
- U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
- 2
In Pitt v. County of Rockland, Judge Briccetti ordered counsel to address service on Officer Spencer and paused defendants’ response deadlines.
Malcolm Pitt, Rockland County, Officer Spencer, the other named defendants, and the Rockland County Department of Law.
What happened
In Pitt v. County of Rockland, Malcolm Pitt, who is incarcerated and has no lawyer, sued Rockland County and several officers. The order concerned delivery of the lawsuit papers to Officer Spencer.
No proof showed that Officer Spencer had been served, although Patrick Fischer had appeared for all defendants and said Spencer had not been served. The court had extended the deadline to serve Spencer to April 3, 2023.
The court ordered Fischer to tell it by April 11 whether the Rockland County Department of Law would accept service for Spencer. It also continued pausing all defendants’ deadlines to answer or otherwise respond to the amended complaint and certain demands. Judge Briccetti denied fee-free appeal status for any appeal from this order.
The detailed version
- Pitt v. County of Rockland · No. 7:22-cv-08356
- Vincent Briccetti
- Apr. 4, 2023
Background
Malcolm Pitt, who is incarcerated, brought this action without a lawyer and was allowed to proceed without paying the filing fee. The defendants are Rockland County, Sergeant Ob lenis, Sergeant Lowe, Correction Officer Karney, Correction Officer G. Vandunk, Officer Figueroa, and Officer Spencer.
The court had directed the Clerk and the U.S. Marshals Service to help complete service of the lawsuit on Officer Spencer. The court later extended the deadline for serving Spencer to April 3, 2023. No proof of service for Spencer had been filed by the date of this order.
Patrick Fischer, a Principal Assistant County Attorney for the Rockland County Department of Law, had appeared for all defendants, including Spencer. Fischer stated in the notice of appearance and in a later letter that Spencer had not been served.
Order
The court ordered Fischer to file a letter by April 11, 2023, stating whether the Rockland County Department of Law would accept service on behalf of Officer Spencer. The court gave this direction because Fischer had already appeared for Spencer and because it considered the step useful for efficient case management.
The court also ordered that all defendants’ deadlines to respond to the Local Rule 33.2 Demands and to answer, move, or otherwise respond to the first amended complaint would remain stayed—that is, paused—until a further court order.
Finally, the court certified under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3) that an appeal from this order would not be taken in good faith and denied fee-free appeal status for that appeal. The order was signed by United States District Judge Vincent L. Briccetti.
Read the full 2-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.