Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled Apr. 4, 2023

Pitt v. County of Rockland

Judge
Vincent Briccetti
Docket
7:22-cv-08356
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
2
Civil ProcedurePro Se
In one sentence

In Pitt v. County of Rockland, Judge Briccetti ordered counsel to address service on Officer Spencer and paused defendants’ response deadlines.

Who this affects

Malcolm Pitt, Rockland County, Officer Spencer, the other named defendants, and the Rockland County Department of Law.

What happened

In Pitt v. County of Rockland, Malcolm Pitt, who is incarcerated and has no lawyer, sued Rockland County and several officers. The order concerned delivery of the lawsuit papers to Officer Spencer.

No proof showed that Officer Spencer had been served, although Patrick Fischer had appeared for all defendants and said Spencer had not been served. The court had extended the deadline to serve Spencer to April 3, 2023.

The court ordered Fischer to tell it by April 11 whether the Rockland County Department of Law would accept service for Spencer. It also continued pausing all defendants’ deadlines to answer or otherwise respond to the amended complaint and certain demands. Judge Briccetti denied fee-free appeal status for any appeal from this order.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Pitt v. County of Rockland · No. 7:22-cv-08356
Judge
Vincent Briccetti
Date
Apr. 4, 2023

Background

Malcolm Pitt, who is incarcerated, brought this action without a lawyer and was allowed to proceed without paying the filing fee. The defendants are Rockland County, Sergeant Ob lenis, Sergeant Lowe, Correction Officer Karney, Correction Officer G. Vandunk, Officer Figueroa, and Officer Spencer.

The court had directed the Clerk and the U.S. Marshals Service to help complete service of the lawsuit on Officer Spencer. The court later extended the deadline for serving Spencer to April 3, 2023. No proof of service for Spencer had been filed by the date of this order.

Patrick Fischer, a Principal Assistant County Attorney for the Rockland County Department of Law, had appeared for all defendants, including Spencer. Fischer stated in the notice of appearance and in a later letter that Spencer had not been served.

Order

The court ordered Fischer to file a letter by April 11, 2023, stating whether the Rockland County Department of Law would accept service on behalf of Officer Spencer. The court gave this direction because Fischer had already appeared for Spencer and because it considered the step useful for efficient case management.

The court also ordered that all defendants’ deadlines to respond to the Local Rule 33.2 Demands and to answer, move, or otherwise respond to the first amended complaint would remain stayed—that is, paused—until a further court order.

Finally, the court certified under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3) that an appeal from this order would not be taken in good faith and denied fee-free appeal status for that appeal. The order was signed by United States District Judge Vincent L. Briccetti.

The authoritative version

Read the full 2-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.