Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled Apr. 5, 2023

Aljahmi v. 1738 Finest Deli Inc.

Judge
Analisa Torres
Docket
1:22-cv-04138
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
1
Civil ProcedurePro Se
In one sentence

In Aljahmi v. 1738 Finest Deli Inc., Judge Torres set plaintiff’s default-judgment deadline at 14 days after final judgment against Aljahmi.

Who this affects

The plaintiff, corporate defendant 1738 Finest Deli Inc., and Aljahmi, the answering defendant who the letter says was defending himself.

What happened

In Aljahmi v. 1738 Finest Deli Inc., the plaintiff asked for more time to seek a judgment against 1738 Finest Deli Inc., which had not responded, while the claim against Aljahmi remained active.

The plaintiff asked to wait until the claim against Aljahmi was resolved to avoid inconsistent judgments and repeated work on damages. Alternatively, the plaintiff asked for an extension until April 18, 2023.

Judge Analisa Torres directed the plaintiff to seek the judgment against 1738 Finest Deli Inc. within 14 days after a final judgment as to Aljahmi. The available text does not clearly state whether the requested extension was granted or denied.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Aljahmi v. 1738 Finest Deli Inc. · No. 1:22-cv-04138
Judge
Analisa Torres
Date
Apr. 5, 2023

Background

The plaintiff’s counsel asked the court to extend the deadline for filing a motion for default judgment against corporate defendant 1738 Finest Deli Inc. A default judgment is a judgment against a party that did not respond to the case. The request sought to postpone that motion until the claim against the answering defendant, Aljahmi, was resolved. The letter also states that Aljahmi was defending himself.

Requested Extension

Counsel argued that waiting would avoid potentially inconsistent judgments and the need to determine damages more than once. Counsel also stated that the deli was closed and that it was unclear, before information could be obtained through the case, whether the corporate defendant had assets that justified further time and expense. In the alternative, counsel requested an extension of approximately two weeks, until April 18, 2023, because of the Passover holiday.

Disposition

The text ends with the direction: “Plaintiff shall move for default judgment within fourteen days of a final judgment as to Defendant Aljahmi.” Judge Analisa Torres therefore set that timing requirement. The available text does not clearly identify whether the request to delay the deadline until resolution of the active claim, or the alternative request for an extension until April 18, 2023, was formally granted or denied. The final sentence is truncated and contains an apparent incomplete name.

The authoritative version

Read the full 1-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.