Aljahmi v. 1738 Finest Deli Inc.
- Analisa Torres
- 1:22-cv-04138
- U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
- 1
In Aljahmi v. 1738 Finest Deli Inc., Judge Torres set plaintiff’s default-judgment deadline at 14 days after final judgment against Aljahmi.
The plaintiff, corporate defendant 1738 Finest Deli Inc., and Aljahmi, the answering defendant who the letter says was defending himself.
What happened
In Aljahmi v. 1738 Finest Deli Inc., the plaintiff asked for more time to seek a judgment against 1738 Finest Deli Inc., which had not responded, while the claim against Aljahmi remained active.
The plaintiff asked to wait until the claim against Aljahmi was resolved to avoid inconsistent judgments and repeated work on damages. Alternatively, the plaintiff asked for an extension until April 18, 2023.
Judge Analisa Torres directed the plaintiff to seek the judgment against 1738 Finest Deli Inc. within 14 days after a final judgment as to Aljahmi. The available text does not clearly state whether the requested extension was granted or denied.
The detailed version
- Aljahmi v. 1738 Finest Deli Inc. · No. 1:22-cv-04138
- Analisa Torres
- Apr. 5, 2023
Background
The plaintiff’s counsel asked the court to extend the deadline for filing a motion for default judgment against corporate defendant 1738 Finest Deli Inc. A default judgment is a judgment against a party that did not respond to the case. The request sought to postpone that motion until the claim against the answering defendant, Aljahmi, was resolved. The letter also states that Aljahmi was defending himself.
Requested Extension
Counsel argued that waiting would avoid potentially inconsistent judgments and the need to determine damages more than once. Counsel also stated that the deli was closed and that it was unclear, before information could be obtained through the case, whether the corporate defendant had assets that justified further time and expense. In the alternative, counsel requested an extension of approximately two weeks, until April 18, 2023, because of the Passover holiday.
Disposition
The text ends with the direction: “Plaintiff shall move for default judgment within fourteen days of a final judgment as to Defendant Aljahmi.” Judge Analisa Torres therefore set that timing requirement. The available text does not clearly identify whether the request to delay the deadline until resolution of the active claim, or the alternative request for an extension until April 18, 2023, was formally granted or denied. The final sentence is truncated and contains an apparent incomplete name.
Read the full 1-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.