Troche v. Think Goodness, LLC
- Andrew Carter
- 1:22-cv-07399
- U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
- 1
In Troche v. Think Goodness, Judge Carter dismissed the case without prejudice because Plaintiff did not respond to an order to show cause.
The dismissal ended Veronica Troche’s action, including the claims she asserted on behalf of herself and others similarly situated, without prejudice.
What happened
In Troche v. Think Goodness, Veronica Troche brought an action on behalf of herself and others similarly situated against Think Goodness, LLC. The court had ordered Troche to explain by March 10, 2023, why the case should not be dismissed for failure to prosecute.
Troche did not respond to that order by the date of the dismissal order. The opinion does not discuss the underlying claims.
Judge Andrew L. Carter, Jr. dismissed the case without prejudice for failure to prosecute under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b).
The detailed version
- Troche v. Think Goodness, LLC · No. 1:22-cv-07399
- Andrew Carter
- Apr. 10, 2023
Background
Veronica Troche sued Think Goodness, LLC on behalf of herself and all others similarly situated. On February 17, 2023, the court ordered Troche to show cause—that is, to explain—by March 10, 2023, why the action should not be dismissed for failure to prosecute under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b).
Court’s Ruling
Troche did not respond to the show-cause order. The court therefore dismissed the case without prejudice for failure to prosecute under Rule 41(b). The opinion does not address the merits of Troche’s underlying claims.
Read the full 1-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.