Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled Apr. 14, 2023

CrossBorder Solutions v. Macias

Judge
Nelson Roman
Docket
7:20-cv-04877
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
3
Civil ProcedureArbitration
In one sentence

In CrossBorder Solutions v. MGO, Judge Roman granted CrossBorder’s request to seal two exhibits filed with its motion to confirm an arbitration award.

Who this affects

CrossBorder Solutions and the other parties to the case, including MGO, Sanjay Agarwal, and former defendants Liga Hoy and Jiaxin “Claire” Song, were affected by the sealing order. The identified exhibits became accessible only to the court and the parties, and the Clerk was directed to terminate the sealing motion.

What happened

CrossBorder Solutions, Inc. n/k/a Exactera Inc. asked to file two exhibits under seal in support of its motion to confirm an arbitration award. The exhibits were the final and corrected final awards from the arbitration.

CrossBorder said the exhibits contained confidential information about its clients, client non-renewal rates, and related costs. They also contained the amount of punitive damages awarded against former defendant Liga Hoy; former defendants Hoy and Jiaxin “Claire” Song had requested redactions of that information.

Judge Nelson S. Roman granted the request. He directed the Clerk to place the identified exhibits under seal, accessible only to the court and the parties, and directed the Clerk to terminate the sealing motion.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
CrossBorder Solutions v. Macias · No. 7:20-cv-04877
Judge
Nelson Roman
Date
Apr. 14, 2023

Background

CrossBorder Solutions, Inc. and Cross Border Transactions, LLC, doing business as CrossBorder Solutions, asked for permission to file Exhibits D and E under seal in connection with their motion to confirm an arbitration award. Exhibit D was a final award issued in the JAMS arbitration on June 29, 2021. Exhibit E was a corrected final award issued on July 30, 2021.

Basis for Sealing

CrossBorder stated that the exhibits contained confidential and proprietary information about its client base, client non-renewal rates attributed to the theft of its trade-secret Master List, and the approximate costs of those outcomes. The exhibits also contained the amount of punitive damages awarded against former defendant Liga Hoy. CrossBorder said that information had been redacted at the request of Hoy and former defendant Jiaxin “Claire” Song.

The request relied on the common-law presumption that judicial documents should generally be accessible to the public, balanced against competing privacy interests. CrossBorder argued that its interest in protecting the confidential information outweighed that presumption. The opinion states that MGO, Sanjay Agarwal, Hoy, and Song had access to unredacted versions of the exhibits. Counsel for MGO and Agarwal and counsel for Hoy consented to the request. Counsel for Song had no objection but stated that he was not currently in contact with Song and therefore could not consent or oppose the request.

Ruling

Judge Nelson S. Roman granted Plaintiffs’ request to file the identified documents under seal. The court directed the Clerk to place ECF Nos. 206-4 and the other identified exhibit under seal, accessible only to the court and the parties to the case. The opinion text does not clearly display the second ECF number. The court also directed the Clerk to terminate the motion at ECF No. 203.

The authoritative version

Read the full 3-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.