Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled Apr. 18, 2023

Zuru PTE. v. Individuals

Full caption

Zuru (Singapore) PTE., Ltd. v. The Individuals, Corporations, Limited Liability Companies, Partnerships, and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A hereto

Judge
Lorna Schofield
Docket
1:22-cv-02483
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
5
Intellectual PropertyCivil Procedure
In one sentence

In Zuru v. The Individuals, Judge Schofield adopted a damages recommendation and directed judgment totaling $5.2 million against 104 defaulting defendants.

Who this affects

Zuru received a total damages judgment of $5,200,000. The 104 defendants listed as defaulting defendants were each subject to a $50,000 judgment.

What happened

Zuru (Singapore) PTE., Ltd. v. The Individuals, Corporations, Limited Liability Companies, Partnerships, and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A concerned copyright and trademark infringement claims against 104 defendants who did not appear or otherwise defend the case.

A magistrate judge recommended awarding Zuru $50,000 against each defaulting defendant. No timely objections were filed, so the district court reviewed the recommendation only for clear error in the record.

Judge Lorna G. Schofield found no clear error, adopted the recommendation, directed the Clerk of Court to enter judgment against each listed defaulting defendant, awarded Zuru $5.2 million in total damages, and ordered the case closed.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Zuru PTE. v. Individuals · No. 1:22-cv-02483
Judge
Lorna Schofield
Date
Apr. 18, 2023

Background

Zuru brought a copyright and trademark infringement action against defendants identified on Schedule A. The opinion states that 104 defendants were in default. On March 31, 2023, Magistrate Judge Gorenstein issued a report and recommendation after an inquiry into damages. The recommendation called for a $50,000 judgment against each defaulting defendant.

Review of the Recommendation

The deadline for objections was 14 days after service of the report and recommendation, and no timely objections were filed. The court explained that when no timely objection is made, a district judge reviews the recommendation for clear error on the face of the record rather than conducting a fresh review of the challenged issues. The court found no clear error.

Ruling

The court adopted the report and recommendation. It directed the Clerk of Court to enter judgment against each defaulting defendant listed in the attached schedule for $50,000. The total damages award to Zuru was $5,200,000, and the court ordered the case closed.

The authoritative version

Read the full 5-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.