Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled Apr. 18, 2023

Slade v. Sanvello Health Inc.

Judge
Vyskocil
Docket
1:23-cv-01218
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
1
Civil ProcedureContract
In one sentence

In Slade v. Sanvello Health Inc., Judge Vyskocil discontinued the action after the parties reported a settlement in principle.

Who this affects

Linda Slade and Sanvello Health, Inc.; the action was discontinued based on the parties’ reported settlement in principle, with a deadline to seek restoration if the settlement was not put in writing.

What happened

In Slade v. Sanvello Health, Inc., Linda Slade told the court that she and Sanvello Health, Inc. had reached a settlement in principle.

The court discontinued the action without costs to either party and allowed it to be restored if the parties could not put their settlement in writing, provided an application was made by May 18, 2023. If no application was made by that date, the dismissal would be with prejudice.

Judge Mary Kay Vyskocil entered the order on April 18, 2023. The opinion does not describe the underlying claims or the settlement’s terms.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Slade v. Sanvello Health Inc. · No. 1:23-cv-01218
Judge
Vyskocil
Date
Apr. 18, 2023

Background

Linda Slade filed this action against Sanvello Health, Inc. The opinion does not state what claims Slade brought. Slade notified the court by letter that the parties had reached a settlement in principle.

Court’s Action

The court ordered that the action be discontinued without costs to any party and without prejudice to restoring the action to the court’s calendar if the parties were unable to memorialize their settlement in writing. Any application to restore the action had to be made by May 18, 2023.

The order further stated that if no application to restore the action was made by that date, the dismissal would be with prejudice, meaning the action could not be refiled. The opinion does not address the settlement’s terms or the merits of the underlying dispute.

Disposition

Judge Mary Kay Vyskocil entered the order of dismissal on April 18, 2023.

The authoritative version

Read the full 1-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.