Ambrister v. New York City Department of Education
- Analisa Torres
- 1:22-cv-05516
- U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
- 2
In Ambrister v. New York City Department of Education, Judge Torres granted a request to seal the administrative record.
The ruling affects the New York City Department of Education, the plaintiffs, minor student R.D., and public access to the certified administrative record.
What happened
Ambrister v. New York City Department of Education concerns an action under the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act brought on behalf of minor student R.D. The Department of Education asked to file the certified administrative record under seal.
The Department said the record included R.D.'s identifying information, medical history, disabilities, and educational records, as well as hearing transcripts and exhibits. It argued that these materials were confidential under federal law and that protecting R.D.'s privacy outweighed the public's interest in access. Plaintiffs' counsel consented to the request.
Judge Analisa Torres granted the request. She concluded that the Department showed that filing the record under seal outweighed the presumption of public access.
The detailed version
- Ambrister v. New York City Department of Education · No. 1:22-cv-05516
- Analisa Torres
- Apr. 19, 2023
Background The action was brought under the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act on behalf of minor student R.D. The New York City Department of Education asked for permission to file the certified administrative record, identified as ECF No. 35, under seal.
Request to Seal The Department represented that the record contained confidential information, including R.D.'s name, date of birth, other identifying information, medical history, disabilities, educational progress, and educational history. The record also included transcripts from hearings before the Impartial Hearing Office and State Review Office, along with exhibits and educational records.
The Department argued that the information was protected under the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act, and the Family Educational Rights and Privacy Act. It also argued that the underlying administrative proceeding was presumptively closed to the public and that protecting R.D.'s privacy interests outweighed the public's interest in access. Plaintiffs' counsel consented to the request.
Ruling The court granted the request to file the administrative record under seal. Judge Analisa Torres concluded that the Department met its burden to show that the interests supporting sealing outweighed the presumption of public access under the standard from Lugosch v. Pyramid Co. of Onondaga. The order addressed the record's filing status and did not decide the underlying Individuals with Disabilities Education Act dispute.
Read the full 2-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.