Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled Apr. 20, 2023

Quinones v. Los Corbaticas Deli Grocery II Corp.

Judge
Edgardo Ramos
Docket
1:22-cv-10895
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
1
Civil Procedure
In one sentence

In Quinones v. Los Corbaticas Deli Grocery II Corp., Judge Ramos granted the parties’ request to extend the settlement-materials deadline to May 7, 2023.

Who this affects

The parties in Quinones et al. v. Los Corbaticas Deli Grocery II Corp. et al., because the deadline for submitting settlement materials was extended to May 7, 2023.

What happened

In Quinones et al. v. Los Corbaticas Deli Grocery II Corp. et al., the parties asked for more time to submit materials related to settling the case.

The parties said they had overlooked an April 7 deadline and were working toward resolving the case through a Rule 68 offer of judgment, a formal offer to allow judgment on specified terms. They requested an extension until May 7, 2023, and stated that the request was made with both sides’ consent.

Judge Edgardo Ramos granted the parties’ request. The order addressed only the deadline for settlement materials and did not decide the underlying claims.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Quinones v. Los Corbaticas Deli Grocery II Corp. · No. 1:22-cv-10895
Judge
Edgardo Ramos
Date
Apr. 20, 2023

Background The court had previously ordered the parties to submit settlement documents for review by April 7, 2023. The parties’ attorney stated that they overlooked that order and asked to change the deadline to one for submitting a Rule 68 offer of judgment and related materials.

Request The parties requested an extension until May 7, 2023. They stated that they expected to resolve the case through a Rule 68 offer of judgment and that this was their first request for this type of extension. The request was submitted with the parties’ consent.

Ruling Judge Edgardo Ramos granted the parties’ request for the extension until May 7, 2023. The opinion is a scheduling and settlement-related order; it does not address the merits of the underlying dispute or state the final result of the case.

The authoritative version

Read the full 1-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.