Jimenez v. ZorbX, Inc.
- Ronnie Abrams
- 1:22-cv-09332
- U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
- 1
In Jimenez v. ZorbX, Inc., Judge Abrams discontinued the settled case without prejudice to timely restoration.
Vanessa Jimenez, the people she sought to represent, and ZorbX, Inc.
What happened
Jimenez v. ZorbX, Inc. involved Vanessa Jimenez, individually and on behalf of others similarly situated, against ZorbX, Inc. The court was told that the case had been settled.
The court discontinued the action without costs to any party and without prejudice to restoring it if an application was made within 60 days. The Clerk of Court was directed to close the case.
Judge Ronnie Abrams also stated that any settlement-enforcement request would require the agreement’s terms to be placed on the public record and approved by the court within the same 60-day period.
The detailed version
- Jimenez v. ZorbX, Inc. · No. 1:22-cv-09332
- Ronnie Abrams
- Apr. 20, 2023
Background
Vanessa Jimenez brought the action individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated against ZorbX, Inc. The opinion states that the Court was informed that the case had been settled. It does not describe the underlying claims or the settlement’s terms.
Disposition
The court ordered that the action be discontinued without costs to any party and without prejudice to restoring the action to the court’s docket if an application to restore it was made within 60 days. It stated that any application to reopen filed after that period might be denied solely because it was late. The court also stated that, if the parties wanted it to retain jurisdiction to enforce the settlement agreement, the agreement’s terms had to be placed on the public record and approved by the court within the same 60-day period. The Clerk of Court was directed to close the case.
Effect
The order ended the case on the court’s docket after the reported settlement, but it did not decide the underlying claims or disclose the settlement terms. Judge Ronnie Abrams entered the order on April 20, 2023.
Read the full 1-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.