Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled Apr. 21, 2023

McFadden v. Keyser

Judge
Nelson Roman
Docket
7:23-cv-00802
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
3
Section 1983Civil RightsPro SeCivil Procedure
In one sentence

In McFadden v. Keyser, Judge Roman ordered New York’s Attorney General to find addresses for eleven defendants so they can be served.

Who this affects

Robert McFadden, the eleven defendants whose addresses must be identified, and the New York State Attorney General, which was ordered to obtain and provide the addresses.

What happened

In McFadden v. Keyser, Robert McFadden, who is incarcerated and representing himself, sued correctional-facility officials under a civil-rights law and a federal religious-protection law. He complained about events that allegedly occurred at Sullivan Correctional Facility between 2019 and 2022.

The court had allowed McFadden to proceed without paying court fees upfront and had directed the U.S. Marshals Service to serve the defendants. McFadden then said that eleven defendants might no longer work at Sullivan Correctional Facility or that he did not know where they could be served.

Judge Roman ordered the New York State Attorney General to determine the addresses of those eleven defendants and provide the information to McFadden and the court within 60 days. The court said it would issue another service order after receiving the information; it did not decide the claims’ merits.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
McFadden v. Keyser · No. 7:23-cv-00802
Judge
Nelson Roman
Date
Apr. 21, 2023

Background

Robert McFadden, who is incarcerated at Mid-State Correctional Facility and is representing himself, brought claims under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 and the Religious Land Use and Institutionalized Persons Act concerning alleged events at Sullivan Correctional Facility between 2019 and 2022. The defendants include correctional-facility officials and employees.

The court had previously granted McFadden permission to proceed without prepaying the filing fee and had directed the U.S. Marshals Service to serve all defendants. McFadden later reported that William Elberth and several other defendants might no longer work at Sullivan Correctional Facility. The court asked him to identify the specific defendants for whom he believed he had no service address.

McFadden identified these eleven defendants: Superintendent William Keyser; Deputy Superintendent of Security Gary Sipple; Captain Kenneth Letus; Food Services Administrator Anthony Rizzuto; Head Cook John Papavasilou; Cook Anthony Carminati; Inmate Grievance Program Supervisor Cory Proscia; Nurse Kathleen Buttles; Correctional Officer William Elberth; C.O. George Gilmour, Sr.; and Hearing Officer Morrow.

Court’s action

Relying on the rule that a self-represented litigant is entitled to the district court’s assistance in identifying a defendant, the court ordered the New York State Attorney General to ascertain the addresses of the eleven listed defendants. The Attorney General was instructed to provide the information to McFadden and the court within 60 days.

The court stated that, after receiving the information, it would issue a supplemental order directing service on those defendants. The Clerk was directed to mail McFadden a copy of the order and record service on the docket. The order addressed identifying service information and did not decide the merits of McFadden’s claims.

The authoritative version

Read the full 3-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.