Marshall v. Newark Tax Assessors Office
- Lewis Liman
- 1:23-cv-03495
- U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
- 3
Marshall v. Newark Tax Assessors Office: Judge Liman transferred Marshall’s case to New Jersey because venue was improper in New York.
Rosalin Denise Marshall and the named defendants; the case will proceed, if at all, in the District of New Jersey rather than the Southern District of New York.
What happened
In Marshall v. Newark Tax Assessors Office, Rosalin Denise Marshall, representing herself, sued two New Jersey offices and three individuals over an estate and New Jersey property. She sought $730,000 and ownership of the property.
The court found that New Jersey was the proper venue because all defendants were alleged to live there and the events and property involved were in New Jersey. It transferred the case to the U.S. District Court for the District of New Jersey rather than dismissing it.
Judge Lewis J. Liman directed the clerk to transfer the action and stated that summonses would not issue from the Southern District of New York. The order closed the case in that court and denied fee-waiver status for an appeal.
The detailed version
- Marshall v. Newark Tax Assessors Office · No. 1:23-cv-03495
- Lewis Liman
- Apr. 27, 2023
Background
Rosalin Denise Marshall filed this case without a lawyer under the court’s diversity jurisdiction. She sued the Newark Tax Assessors Office, the Newark Office of Surrogate or Essex County Office of Surrogate, Annie Scott, Louisa Scott, and James Scott. Marshall sought $730,000 in damages and ownership of real property in East Orange, New Jersey. She alleged that the claims arose from the conveyance of her deceased mother’s estate.
Venue Analysis
The court applied 28 U.S.C. § 1391, the federal venue statute. It explained that a civil case may generally be filed where the defendants reside or where a substantial part of the events or property involved is located. Marshall alleged that all defendants resided in New Jersey, that the relevant events occurred there, and that the property was there. The court therefore concluded that the District of New Jersey was a proper venue under both § 1391(b)(1) and § 1391(b)(2), and that the Southern District of New York was not a proper venue.
Ruling and Disposition
Under 28 U.S.C. § 1406(a), a court may transfer a case filed in the wrong venue when transfer serves the interests of justice. The court transferred this action to the United States District Court for the District of New Jersey. It directed the clerk to make the transfer, stated that summonses would not issue from the Southern District of New York, and ordered that the action be closed in that court. The court also certified that an appeal would not be taken in good faith and denied fee-waiver status for an appeal. Judge Lewis J. Liman did not decide the underlying claims.
Read the full 3-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.