Payne v. BlueTriton Brands, Inc.
- Paul Gardephe
- 1:23-cv-00939
- U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
- 2
In Payne v. BlueTriton, Judge Parker set deadlines for amending pleadings, completing discovery, and filing a status letter.
The plaintiff, the defendant, and their counsel are affected by the deadlines and discovery requirements in the scheduling order.
What happened
In Payne v. BlueTriton Brands, Inc., the parties appeared for an initial case-management conference on April 27, 2023.
The court allowed amendments to the pleadings and new parties until June 1, 2023, set December 29, 2023, as the deadline to complete fact discovery, and required a joint status letter by May 29, 2023. The order also directed counsel to follow the court’s procedures and the federal rules governing discovery.
Judge Katharine H. Parker entered the scheduling order under Rule 16 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. The order did not decide the merits of the case.
The detailed version
- Payne v. BlueTriton Brands, Inc. · No. 1:23-cv-00939
- Paul Gardephe
- Apr. 27, 2023
Nature of the Order
The court entered a scheduling order after the parties appeared for an initial case-management conference. A scheduling order sets deadlines and procedures for moving a case forward; it does not resolve the parties’ underlying claims.
Deadlines and Procedures
The parties could amend the pleadings and join additional parties until June 1, 2023. After that date, further amendments or joinder would require good cause.
The deadline to complete fact discovery was December 29, 2023. The court directed the parties to follow its individual procedures for discovery disputes and required counsel to comply with Rules 1 and 26(b)(1) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure when conducting discovery.
The court also reminded counsel of their obligations under Rules 34 and 26(g) concerning document requests and discovery responses. It warned that broad requests for all documents on a topic are presumptively improper and that objections that do not adequately explain their grounds may be forfeited. The court cited decisions stating that discovery responses failing to state objections specifically and identify whether documents are being withheld may waive those objections, except objections based on privilege.
The parties were required to file a joint status letter by May 29, 2023.
Disposition
Judge Katharine H. Parker entered the scheduling order pursuant to Rule 16. The opinion does not report a ruling on the merits of any claim or defense.
Read the full 2-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.