Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled Apr. 27, 2023

Martinenko v. 212 Steakhouse Inc.

Judge
Rochon
Docket
1:22-cv-00518
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
3
Class ActionCivil ProcedureEmployment
In one sentence

In Martinenko v. 212 Steakhouse, Judge Rochon granted class certification for tipped employees’ New York labor-law claims and ordered notice and class-list production.

Who this affects

The certified class of tipped employees who worked for the defendants at 212 Steakhouse on or after January 20, 2016; class representatives Martinenko and Huk; class counsel; and the defendants, who must produce the class list to the stated extent and issue the approved notice.

What happened

Nino Martinenko and opt-in plaintiff Dagmara Huk asked the court to certify a class for their New York Labor Law claims against 212 Steakhouse Inc. and Nikolay Volper. The case also asserts claims under the Federal Labor Standards Act.

The court adopted a magistrate judge’s recommendation after finding no clear error and noting that neither side objected. It certified a class of tipped employees who worked for the defendants at 212 Steakhouse on or after January 20, 2016.

Judge Jennifer L. Rochon appointed Martinenko and Huk as class representatives, appointed Joseph & Kirschenbaum LLP as class counsel, required the defendants to produce a class list if they controlled the necessary information, and approved the proposed class notice.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Martinenko v. 212 Steakhouse Inc. · No. 1:22-cv-00518
Judge
Rochon
Date
Apr. 27, 2023

Background

Nino Martinenko brought this action against 212 Steakhouse Inc. and Nikolay Volper, asserting violations of the Federal Labor Standards Act and the New York Labor Law. Martinenko and opt-in plaintiff Dagmara Huk moved under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 23 to certify a class for the New York Labor Law claims. They also asked the court to appoint them as class representatives, appoint their lawyers as class counsel, require the defendants to produce a class list, and approve a proposed class notice.

Review of the Recommendation

Magistrate Judge Robert W. Lehrburger recommended granting the class-certification motion. The recommendation warned that objections were due within 14 days and that failing to object would waive further review. No party objected by the April 26, 2023 deadline. The court therefore reviewed the recommendation for clear error, meaning an obvious mistake on the record, and found its reasoning sound and supported by the facts and law.

Ruling

Judge Jennifer L. Rochon adopted the recommendation in its entirety and granted the plaintiffs’ motion for class certification. The certified class consists of all tipped employees—servers, runners, bussers, and bartenders—who worked for the defendants at 212 Steakhouse at any time on or after January 20, 2016.

The court also:

- appointed Martinenko and Huk as class representatives; - appointed Joseph & Kirschenbaum LLP as class counsel; - required the defendants to produce a complete class list to the extent they possessed, controlled, or had custody of information needed to compile it; and - approved and authorized issuance of the class notice presented with the plaintiffs’ filing.

The court stated that the absence of timely objections, after clear notice of the consequences, precluded appellate review of this decision. It directed the Clerk of Court to terminate the class-certification motion.

The authoritative version

Read the full 3-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.