IN RE: NEW YORK CITY POLICING DURING SUMMER 2020 DEMONSTRATIONS
- Colleen McMahon
- 1:20-cv-08924
- U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
- 3
In re: New York City Policing During Summer 2020 Demonstrations: Judge McMahon received notice of a proposed settlement and scheduling requests, but this filing shows no ruling.
The parties and the proposed class members identified in the related Sow case were the subjects of the proposed settlement. The filing does not show that the court approved the settlement or changed anyone's legal rights.
What happened
In re: New York City Policing During Summer 2020 Demonstrations is a joint filing telling the court that the parties in the related Sow case had reached a proposed settlement in principle. The proposed class would include people arrested at specific New York City protest locations between May 28 and June 4, 2020.
The parties said the proposed settlement included payments to class members and that they wanted to pause further discovery while they prepared settlement papers. They asked for more time, until June 30, 2023, to submit those papers and asked the court to indefinitely pause class-certification motion practice.
The provided filing does not show whether Judge Colleen McMahon granted or denied either request. It also does not show court approval of the proposed settlement.
The detailed version
- IN RE: NEW YORK CITY POLICING DURING SUMMER 2020 DEMONSTRATIONS · No. 1:20-cv-08924
- Colleen McMahon
- May 1, 2023
Nature of the Filing
This document is a joint letter from the parties, not a ruling that resolves the underlying claims. The letter concerns the related case, Sow et al. v. City of New York et al., No. 21-cv-00533 (CM) (GWG), which was brought as a proposed class action seeking declarations and money damages.
Proposed Settlement
The parties informed the court that they had reached a proposed settlement in principle covering the claims of the proposed class in the related case. They stated that the proposed class would consist of people arrested between May 28, 2020, and June 4, 2020, at specified protest locations in New York City. The parties said they had agreed to terms including payment amounts for proposed class members. They also said they intended to address reasonable litigation costs and attorneys’ fees separately.
Requests to the Court
The parties requested until June 30, 2023, to submit a settlement stipulation and related materials. They said those materials would include a request for preliminary approval, proposed appointment of a class administrator, class-certification materials under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 23, and proposed notices and claim forms.
The parties also asked the court to pause further discovery and to pause class-certification motion practice indefinitely while they completed settlement negotiations. The letter referenced an existing deadline requiring the plaintiffs to seek class certification by April 30, 2023.
What the Provided Text Shows
The text provided does not include an order granting or denying the requested extension or pauses. It also does not show that the court approved the proposed settlement, certified a class, or entered judgment. Judge Colleen McMahon is identified in the filing, but the supplied text does not contain a ruling by her.
Read the full 3-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.