Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled May 2, 2023

Gibson v. Scarr Pizza, LLC

Judge
John Cronan
Docket
1:23-cv-00345
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
1
Civil Procedure
In one sentence

In Gibson v. Scarr Pizza, Judge Cronan granted the parties two more weeks to finalize their settlement and file dismissal paperwork.

Who this affects

The parties in Gibson v. Scarr Pizza, LLC, including the plaintiff and defendants, received additional time to finalize the reported settlement and file dismissal paperwork.

What happened

Gibson v. Scarr Pizza, LLC involved a joint request for additional time to complete a settlement. The opinion does not describe the underlying claims.

The plaintiff’s lawyer told the court that the parties had reached settlement terms acceptable to everyone but needed more time to finalize them. The parties requested two weeks and apologized for missing the court’s May 1 deadline.

Judge John P. Cronan granted the request and ordered the parties to file a settlement-related dismissal letter by May 16, 2023. The text does not say that the case was dismissed.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Gibson v. Scarr Pizza, LLC · No. 1:23-cv-00345
Judge
John Cronan
Date
May 2, 2023

Background

The plaintiff’s lawyer submitted a letter stating that the parties had reached a settlement on terms acceptable to all parties but needed additional time to finalize it. The parties jointly requested two weeks to complete the settlement and file a stipulation of dismissal, meaning a filing asking the court to end the case by agreement. The letter also acknowledged that the parties had missed the court’s May 1 deadline for filing either that stipulation or a joint settlement-status letter.

Ruling

The court granted the request for additional time. It ordered the parties to file a stipulation of dismissal letter concerning the settlement by May 16, 2023. The opinion does not state that the settlement was finalized or that the case was dismissed, and it does not address the underlying claims or their merits.

The authoritative version

Read the full 1-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.