Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled May 2, 2023

State of New York v. United States Department of Labor

Judge
Sidney Stein
Docket
1:21-cv-00536
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
1
Civil ProcedureEmployment
In one sentence

In State of New York v. United States Department of Labor, Judge Stein dismissed the case as moot for lack of subject-matter jurisdiction.

Who this affects

The parties to the case; the court dismissed the matter after concluding that no active controversy remained.

What happened

In State of New York v. United States Department of Labor, the court considered a matter involving the Equal Opportunity Clause’s religious exemption rule. The opinion says the rule’s implementing legal requirements were rescinded effective March 31, 2023.

The court concluded that the rescission left no active case or controversy. It dismissed the matter for lack of subject-matter jurisdiction, meaning the court no longer had authority to decide it.

Judge Sidney H. Stein issued the order on May 2, 2023.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
State of New York v. United States Department of Labor · No. 1:21-cv-00536
Judge
Sidney Stein
Date
May 2, 2023

Background

The opinion concerns a case involving the Equal Opportunity Clause’s religious exemption rule. The court noted that the implementing legal requirements for that rule had been rescinded effective March 31, 2023.

Court’s Analysis

The court determined that the rescission meant there was no longer an active “case or controversy.” A case is moot when a live dispute no longer remains for the court to resolve. Because no active controversy remained, the court concluded that it lacked subject-matter jurisdiction, meaning authority to hear and decide the matter.

Disposition

The court dismissed the case for lack of subject-matter jurisdiction. Judge Sidney H. Stein issued the order after the parties appeared for a teleconference.

The authoritative version

Read the full 1-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.