Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled May 4, 2023

Abadi v. Apple, Inc.

Judge
Paul Gardephe
Docket
1:23-cv-03367
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
3
Civil ProcedurePro Se
In one sentence

In Abadi v. Apple, Inc., Judge Gardephe ordered U.S. Marshals service for Abadi’s disability-discrimination lawsuit and denied fee-free appeal status.

Who this affects

Aaron Abadi, Apple, Inc., the Clerk of Court, and the U.S. Marshals Service.

What happened

In Abadi v. Apple, Inc., Aaron Abadi, representing himself, alleges that Apple discriminated against him because of his disability under federal disability laws and other federal statutes. The court had allowed him to proceed without paying filing fees.

Because Abadi could proceed without paying fees, the court directed the Clerk of Court to issue a summons and prepare the paperwork needed for the U.S. Marshals Service to serve Apple. The court extended the service deadline to 90 days after the summons is issued and said Abadi should request more time if service is not completed by then.

Judge Gardephe ordered the Clerk to send the service materials to the Marshals Service and mail Abadi an information package. The court also denied fee-free status for any appeal from this order after finding that such an appeal would not be taken in good faith.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Abadi v. Apple, Inc. · No. 1:23-cv-03367
Judge
Paul Gardephe
Date
May 4, 2023

Background

Aaron Abadi, who is representing himself, sued Apple, Inc. He alleges discrimination based on disability under the Americans with Disabilities Act, the Rehabilitation Act, and federal statutes concerning conspiracies to interfere with civil rights and failure to prevent such interference. The court had granted Abadi permission to proceed without prepaying court fees.

Service of the lawsuit

A plaintiff who is allowed to proceed without prepaying fees may rely on the court and the U.S. Marshals Service to serve the defendant. The court therefore directed the Clerk of Court to complete the U.S. Marshals Service process forms for Apple, issue a summons, and provide the Marshals Service with the documents needed to serve Apple.

The court explained that the usual 90-day service period could not begin when Abadi filed the complaint because he could not serve the summons and complaint until the court reviewed the filing and ordered the summons issued. The court extended the service deadline to 90 days after the summons is issued. If service is not completed within that period, Abadi should request an extension. The court also stated that Abadi must notify the court in writing if his address changes and that the case may be dismissed if he fails to do so.

Disposition

Judge Gardephe instructed the Clerk to issue the summons, complete the service forms with Apple’s address, deliver the necessary documents to the Marshals Service, and mail Abadi an information package. The court certified that any appeal from this order would not be taken in good faith and denied permission to proceed without prepaying fees for purposes of an appeal. This order addressed service and appeal-fee status; it did not decide whether Abadi’s disability-discrimination allegations were legally or factually valid.

The authoritative version

Read the full 3-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.