Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled May 8, 2023

Mercer v. VIACOMCBS/PARAMOUNT

Judge
Lorna Schofield
Docket
1:22-cv-06322
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
3
Civil ProcedurePro Se
In one sentence

In Mercer v. VIACOMCBS/PARAMOUNT, Judge Schofield ordered Marshals service for Amirah Mercer’s discrimination case after fee-free filing was granted.

Who this affects

Amirah Mercer, a self-represented plaintiff, and VIACOMCBS/PARAMOUNT, the defendant to be served.

What happened

Amirah Mercer, representing herself, sued VIACOMCBS/PARAMOUNT alleging discrimination. The court had previously allowed her to proceed without paying filing fees upfront.

Because Mercer was allowed to proceed without upfront fees, the court said the U.S. Marshals Service must serve the summons and complaint for her. The court also recognized that earlier service attempts had been unsuccessful.

Judge Lorna G. Schofield ordered the Clerk of Court to issue the summons, prepare the required service form using the listed address, and give the documents to the Marshals Service. The court also told Mercer to request more time if she did not receive notice of service within 90 days after the summons was issued.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Mercer v. VIACOMCBS/PARAMOUNT · No. 1:22-cv-06322
Judge
Lorna Schofield
Date
May 8, 2023

Background

Amirah Mercer, who was representing herself, brought this action alleging that VIACOMCBS/PARAMOUNT discriminated against her. In an earlier order, the court granted Mercer permission to proceed without prepaying filing fees.

Service of Process

A plaintiff permitted to proceed without prepaying fees may rely on the court and the U.S. Marshals Service to serve the defendant. The court noted that Mercer could not have served the summons and complaint before the court reviewed the complaint and ordered the summons issued. It also noted that earlier attempts to serve the defendant had not succeeded.

The court extended the time for service. It instructed the Clerk of Court to complete a U.S. Marshals Service Process Receipt and Return form for VIACOMCBS/PARAMOUNT using the address listed in the order, issue a summons, and deliver the necessary paperwork to the Marshals Service. If Mercer did not receive notice that the complaint had been served within 90 days after the summons was issued, the court directed her to request an extension of time. The court also stated that Mercer must notify it in writing if her address changes and that the action could be dismissed if she failed to do so.

Ruling

Judge Lorna G. Schofield ordered the Clerk of Court to issue the summons, prepare the service form, and provide the documents to the U.S. Marshals Service. The court also directed the Clerk to mail Mercer an information package. The order addressed service procedures and did not decide whether the discrimination allegations were valid.

The authoritative version

Read the full 3-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.