Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled May 4, 2023

Kelly Toys Holdings LLC. v. www.Axolotlsquishmallow.com

Judge
Alvin Hellerstein
Docket
1:23-cv-01382
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
2
Civil Procedure
In one sentence

In Kelly Toys v. www.Axolotlsquishmallow.com, Judge Hellerstein granted a defendant’s motion to set aside a clerk’s certificate of default.

Who this affects

Kelly Toys Holdings LLC and the defendant whose name is inconsistently given in the opinion as www.bigfootsquishmallow.com and www.bigsquishmallow.com.

What happened

Kelly Toys Holdings LLC filed a complaint, and the opinion says a defendant did not respond. The Clerk then issued a certificate of default. The defendant later filed an answer and moved to set aside the default; Kelly Toys did not oppose the motion.

The court applied the rule allowing a default to be set aside for good cause. It considered whether the failure to respond was intentional, whether setting aside the default would harm the opposing party, and whether the defendant had a potentially valid defense. The court also noted that cases are generally preferred to be decided on their merits.

Judge Alvin K. Hellerstein granted the motion and set aside the Clerk’s Certificates of Default. The opinion inconsistently refers to the defendant as www.bigfootsquishmallow.com and www.bigsquishmallow.com.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Kelly Toys Holdings LLC. v. www.Axolotlsquishmallow.com · No. 1:23-cv-01382
Judge
Alvin Hellerstein
Date
May 4, 2023

Background

Kelly Toys Holdings LLC filed its complaint on March 6, 2023. The opinion states that a defendant failed to respond or otherwise make a motion concerning the complaint. On April 24, 2023, the Clerk of Court issued a Certificate of Default. On May 3, 2023, the defendant filed an answer and moved to set aside the default. The opinion states that Kelly Toys did not oppose the motion.

The opinion identifies the moving defendant as “www.bigfootsquishmallow.com” in the background section, but the ruling later refers to “www.bigsquishmallow.com.” Neither name appears in the caption reproduced in the opinion. Because of this inconsistency, the identity of the affected defendant is unclear from the text.

Legal standard

Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 55(c) permits a court to set aside an entry of default for “good cause.” The court stated that it must consider three factors: whether the default was intentional, whether setting it aside would harm the opposing party, and whether the defendant has a potentially valid defense. The court also emphasized the general preference for resolving cases on their merits rather than by default and stated that doubts should be resolved in favor of the party in default.

Ruling

The court granted the defendant’s motion to set aside the Clerk’s Certificates of Default. It did not state separate findings on each of the three good-cause factors. Judge Alvin K. Hellerstein entered the order. The opinion’s date is not legible in the reproduced signature block; May 4, 2023 is the filing date supplied with the opinion.

The authoritative version

Read the full 2-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.