Lopez v. Lensbaby, Inc.
- Vyskocil
- 1:23-cv-01954
- U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
- 1
In Lopez v. Lensbaby, Inc., Judge Vyskocil ordered the action discontinued after the parties reported a settlement in principle.
Iliana Lopez, the people she sought to represent, and Lensbaby, Inc.
What happened
In Lopez v. Lensbaby, Inc., Iliana Lopez brought an action on behalf of herself and others similarly situated against Lensbaby, Inc. The opinion does not describe the claims.
Lensbaby told the court that the parties had reached a settlement in principle. The court did not provide details about the settlement.
Judge Mary Kay Vyskocil ordered the action discontinued without costs to any party and without prejudice to restoring it if the parties could not put their settlement in writing and applied to restore the case by June 8, 2023. If no application was made by that date, the dismissal would be with prejudice.
The detailed version
- Lopez v. Lensbaby, Inc. · No. 1:23-cv-01954
- Vyskocil
- May 8, 2023
Background
Iliana Lopez filed the action on behalf of herself and all others similarly situated against Lensbaby, Inc. The opinion does not identify the claims or state whether a class had been certified.
Settlement and Disposition
The court received a letter from Lensbaby stating that the parties had reached a settlement in principle. The court ordered the action discontinued without costs to any party. The order allowed either side to seek restoration of the action to the court’s calendar if the parties could not memorialize the settlement in writing, provided that the application to restore was made by June 8, 2023.
The order states that if no application to restore the action was made by that date, the dismissal would be with prejudice. The opinion does not decide the underlying claims or describe the settlement’s terms.
Read the full 1-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.