Yan Luis v. Alt Fragrances LLC
- Valerie Caproni
- 1:22-cv-10215
- U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
- 2
In Yan Luis v. Alt Fragrances, Judge Caproni dismissed the website-accessibility case without prejudice because Yan Luis lacked standing.
Kevin Yan Luis and the proposed group of similarly situated plaintiffs; the case concerned their website-accessibility claims against Alt Fragrances LLC.
What happened
In Kevin Yan Luis v. Alt Fragrances LLC, Yan Luis claimed that the company’s website was inaccessible to visually impaired people, violating federal, state, and city disability-rights laws.
The court questioned whether Yan Luis had standing—the legal ability to bring the case—because his allegations did not provide enough detail about his website visits, intended purchases, or plans to return. The court ordered him to explain why the case should continue, but he did not respond by the final deadline after receiving two extensions.
Judge Valerie Caproni dismissed the case without prejudice for lack of standing and directed the Clerk of Court to close the case and all open motions.
The detailed version
- Yan Luis v. Alt Fragrances LLC · No. 1:22-cv-10215
- Valerie Caproni
- May 10, 2023
Background
Kevin Yan Luis sued Alt Fragrances LLC on behalf of himself and others similarly situated. He alleged that Alt Fragrances’ website was not accessible to visually impaired people, violating the Americans with Disabilities Act, the New York State Human Rights Law, the New York State Civil Rights Law, and the New York City Human Rights Law.
The complaint alleged that Yan Luis made “numerous attempts” to complete a purchase on the website, including an online purchase of cologne, and that he intended to visit the website in the future to purchase fragrances because he enjoyed the selections available there.
Standing Issue
Standing is the legal requirement that a person show a sufficient connection to the dispute to ask a federal court to decide it. The court had authority to consider standing even without a party requesting that review. On April 3, 2023, the court concluded that the complaint likely did not adequately allege standing under the governing Second Circuit precedent. The court ordered Yan Luis to explain why the case should not be dismissed and twice extended his deadline to respond. His final deadline was May 5, 2023, but he did not respond.
The court held that the complaint’s vague assertions were insufficient. In particular, Yan Luis did not provide details about how often he visited the website, what items he intended to purchase on each occasion, why he sought to purchase those items from Alt Fragrances specifically, or what unique items he wanted to purchase from the company in the future.
Disposition
The court dismissed the case without prejudice for lack of standing. It also directed the Clerk of Court to close all open motions and close the case. The order did not decide whether Alt Fragrances violated any of the disability-rights laws; it ended the case because the court found that Yan Luis had not adequately shown that he could bring the claims.
Result
The case was dismissed without prejudice for lack of standing.
Read the full 2-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.