Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled May 10, 2023

Riviera Corporation Limited v. Haselson International Trading, Inc.

Judge
Vyskocil
Docket
1:22-cv-07888
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
1
Civil ProcedureContract
In one sentence

In Riviera v. Haselson, Judge Vyskocil discontinued the case after a settlement in principle, allowing restoration by June 12, 2023, or making dismissal with prejudice thereafter.

Who this affects

Riviera Corporation Limited and Haselson International Trading, Inc.

What happened

Riviera Corporation Limited v. Haselson International Trading, Inc. was before the Southern District of New York. The court received notice that the parties had reached a settlement in principle.

The court discontinued the case without costs to either party. It allowed either party to ask to restore the case to the court’s calendar if the parties could not put their settlement in writing, but the request had to be made by June 12, 2023.

Judge Mary Kay Vyskocil ordered that if no request to restore the case was made by that date, the dismissal would be with prejudice.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Riviera Corporation Limited v. Haselson International Trading, Inc. · No. 1:22-cv-07888
Judge
Vyskocil
Date
May 10, 2023

Background The defendant filed a letter informing the court that the parties had reached a settlement in principle.

Court’s Order The court ordered that the action be discontinued without costs to any party. The parties could seek to restore the action to the court’s calendar if they were unable to memorialize their settlement in writing, provided that the request was made by June 12, 2023.

The court further ordered that if no request to restore the action was made by June 12, 2023, the dismissal would be with prejudice. The opinion did not decide the underlying dispute.

The authoritative version

Read the full 1-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.