District Council No. 9 International Union of Painters and Allied Trades…
District Council No. 9 International Union of Painters and Allied Trades AFL-CIO v. Future Shock Architectural Metal & Glass
- Lewis Liman
- 1:22-cv-02859
- U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
- 1
In District Council No. 9 v. Future Shock, Judge Liman confirmed the arbitration award and entered a $3,457 judgment against Future Shock.
District Council No. 9 International Union of Painters and Allied Trades, A.F.L.-C.L.O. received a confirmed arbitration award and a $3,457 judgment against Future Shock Architectural Metals & Glass a/k/a Future Shock Architectural Metals & Glass Corp., which also faces statutory post-judgment interest.
What happened
In District Council No. 9 International Union of Painters and Allied Trades, A.F.L.-C.L.O. v. Future Shock Architectural Metals & Glass, the petitioner asked the court to confirm an arbitration award.
The court granted the petition and confirmed the award. It entered judgment for $3,457, consisting of the $1,250 arbitration award, $1,650 in attorneys’ fees, and $557 in costs. Interest will accrue after judgment at the statutory rate, and the case was closed.
The judgment was issued in an opinion and order by Judge Lewis Liman on May 11, 2023.
The detailed version
- District Council No. 9 International Union of Painters and Allied Trades… · No. 1:22-cv-02859
- Lewis Liman
- May 11, 2023
Background The petitioner sought confirmation of an arbitration award against Future Shock Architectural Metals & Glass a/k/a Future Shock Architectural Metals & Glass Corp. The judgment refers to the court’s Opinion and Order dated May 11, 2023, but that Opinion and Order is not included in the provided text.
Ruling The court granted the petition to confirm the award and confirmed the award. It entered judgment in favor of the petitioner and against the respondent for $3,457, comprising:
- $1,250 for the arbitration award; - $1,650 in attorneys’ fees; and - $557 in costs.
The judgment states that post-judgment interest will accrue at the statutory rate under 28 U.S.C. § 1961. The case was closed.
Read the full 1-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.