Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Substantive rulingFiled May 16, 2023

Shanghai Shenda II LLC v. Feinstein

Judge
Ronnie Abrams
Docket
1:20-cv-07415
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
4
ContractFee PetitionCivil Procedure
In one sentence

In Shanghai Shenda II v. Feinstein, Judge Abrams granted enforcement of a settlement and entered judgment for $200,000, interest, and attorney’s fees.

Who this affects

Shanghai Shenda II LLC received an enforceable judgment, while Steven Feinstein was ordered to pay $200,000, interest at 2.5% per year from March 12, 2021, and $9,457 in attorney’s fees.

What happened

Shanghai Shenda II LLC sued Steven Feinstein over alleged breaches of an employment agreement and unpaid loan amounts. The parties later settled, and the court retained authority to enforce their settlement. Feinstein agreed to pay $162,500 plus interest under a payment schedule, with a larger amount becoming due after a default.

According to Shanghai Shenda II, Feinstein made six payments totaling $37,500 but then stopped making the required payments. The company sent a notice of default, and Feinstein did not cure the default or respond to the enforcement motion. The court found that the settlement was valid and enforceable and that Feinstein had defaulted.

In Shanghai Shenda II v. Feinstein, Judge Ronnie Abrams granted the motion to enforce the settlement. The court directed entry of judgment for $200,000, plus interest at 2.5% per year from March 12, 2021, and $9,457 in attorney’s fees.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Shanghai Shenda II LLC v. Feinstein · No. 1:20-cv-07415
Judge
Ronnie Abrams
Date
May 16, 2023

Background

Shanghai Shenda II LLC sued Steven Feinstein, alleging that he breached an employment agreement and failed to repay loan amounts advanced to him. On March 12, 2021, the parties entered into a written settlement agreement. Feinstein agreed to pay $162,500 plus interest at 2.5% per year under a fixed payment schedule.

The agreement defined an event of default to include failing to make a required payment within 10 days after receiving a notice of default. If a default occurred, the agreement made the entire debt—$237,500—immediately due and payable, with credit for payments already made. It also allowed Shanghai Shenda II to recover the costs of enforcing the judgment, including reasonable attorney’s fees.

On March 19, 2021, the court approved the parties’ joint request to dismiss the case while retaining jurisdiction to enforce the settlement agreement.

Default and Enforcement Motion

Shanghai Shenda II represented that Feinstein made the first six payments but failed to make timely payments beginning September 1, 2022. The opinion states that Feinstein’s last payment was made on June 13, 2022, and that he had paid $37,500. Shanghai Shenda II sent a notice of default to Feinstein’s attorney by email on September 9, 2022. The company represented that Feinstein had not cured the default. Feinstein did not respond to the motion.

The court explained that enforcing a settlement agreement is treated as enforcing a contract. It found that the agreement was valid and enforceable and that Feinstein had defaulted under its terms.

Ruling

The court granted Shanghai Shenda II LLC’s motion to enforce the settlement agreement. It directed the Clerk of Court to enter judgment for $200,000, plus interest on that amount at 2.5% per year from March 12, 2021, and $9,457 in attorney’s fees. The court found the requested attorney’s fees reasonable. Judge Ronnie Abrams also directed the Clerk to terminate the pending motion.

The authoritative version

Read the full 4-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.