Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled May 16, 2023

Hickory Capital, LLC v. SME Capital, LLC

Judge
Analisa Torres
Docket
1:22-cv-10729
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
1
Civil ProcedurePro Se
In one sentence

In Hickory Capital v. SME Capital, Judge Torres ordered Hickory Capital to retain counsel and file an appearance by May 29, 2023.

Who this affects

Hickory Capital, LLC, the plaintiff, was required to retain new counsel and have counsel file a notice of appearance.

What happened

In Hickory Capital, LLC v. SME Capital, LLC, the plaintiff’s attorney was allowed to withdraw, but no new attorney had appeared for the plaintiff.

The court reminded Hickory Capital that corporations and similar entities cannot represent themselves without a lawyer. It ordered Hickory Capital to retain new counsel and have that lawyer file a notice of appearance by May 29, 2023.

Judge Analisa Torres issued the order on May 16, 2023. The opinion does not state that the case or any claim was dismissed.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Hickory Capital, LLC v. SME Capital, LLC · No. 1:22-cv-10729
Judge
Analisa Torres
Date
May 16, 2023

Background

On March 14, 2023, the Court granted the plaintiff’s attorney’s motion to withdraw and gave Hickory Capital, LLC until May 15, 2023, to retain new counsel. No attorney had filed a notice of appearance on Hickory Capital’s behalf by May 16.

Court’s Action

The Court reminded Hickory Capital that corporations and other artificial entities cannot proceed without a lawyer. The Court ordered Hickory Capital to retain new counsel by May 29, 2023, and required that counsel to file a notice of appearance.

Disposition

Judge Analisa Torres entered the order requiring Hickory Capital to obtain counsel and file a notice of appearance by the stated deadline. The opinion does not state that the case or any claim was dismissed.

The authoritative version

Read the full 1-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.