Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled May 18, 2023

Guerrero v. Ogawa USA Inc.

Judge
Lorna Schofield
Docket
1:22-cv-02583
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
1
Civil ProcedureMotion to Dismiss
In one sentence

In Guerrero v. Ogawa USA Inc., Judge Schofield ordered Guerrero to submit a verified complaint to help resolve Ogawa’s fact-based dismissal motion.

Who this affects

Edelmira Guerrero was required to submit a verified complaint by May 24, 2023; Ogawa USA Inc.’s motion to dismiss remained unresolved.

What happened

In Guerrero v. Ogawa USA Inc., Ogawa USA Inc. filed a motion asking the court to dismiss Edelmira Guerrero’s amended complaint. The motion included an affidavit from Mark Holmes.

The court treated the motion as a fact-based challenge to federal jurisdiction because Ogawa submitted evidence beyond the complaint. The opinion does not decide whether the motion should be granted or denied.

Judge Lorna G. Schofield ordered Guerrero to submit a verified complaint by May 24, 2023, so the court would have evidence to resolve the motion.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Guerrero v. Ogawa USA Inc. · No. 1:22-cv-02583
Judge
Lorna Schofield
Date
May 18, 2023

Background

Ogawa USA Inc. moved to dismiss Edelmiра Guerrero’s First Amended Complaint on September 20, 2022. The motion was accompanied by an affidavit from Mark Holmes.

Court’s Action

The court determined that the affidavit made the motion a fact-based motion under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(1). That type of motion relies on evidence beyond the complaint when challenging federal subject-matter jurisdiction.

The court ordered Guerrero to submit a verified complaint by May 24, 2023, to provide an evidentiary basis for resolving Ogawa’s motion. The opinion does not state that the motion to dismiss was granted or denied.

Result

Judge Lorna G. Schofield ordered the submission of a verified complaint. This order did not decide the merits of the motion to dismiss.

The authoritative version

Read the full 1-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.