Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled May 18, 2023

Hong v. Mommy's Jamaican Market Corp.

Judge
Lewis Liman
Docket
1:20-cv-09612
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
3
BankruptcyCivil ProcedureDiscoveryFlsa
In one sentence

In Hong v. Mommy’s Jamaican Market Corp., Judge Liman stayed the case only against two bankruptcy-filing defendants and allowed proceedings against the others.

Who this affects

Kap Won Kim and Myong Su Kim received a stay of the action against them because they filed for bankruptcy. Mommy’s Jamaican Market Corp. and Dae Kyu Kim remained subject to the scheduled evidentiary hearing, and Hong could seek discovery from the bankrupt defendants for use against them.

What happened

In Hong v. Mommy’s Jamaican Market Corp., two defendants, Kap Won Kim and Myong Su Kim, filed for bankruptcy while the case was pending. They asked the court to pause the case as to them, and Sun Yeul Hong did not oppose that request.

The court had scheduled a hearing about whether to undo its earlier decision reopening the case and canceling a default judgment. The court allowed that hearing to continue as to Mommy’s Jamaican Market Corp. and Dae Kyu Kim, who had not filed for bankruptcy. Hong may also seek testimony and documents from Kap Won Kim and Myong Su Kim for use against those non-bankrupt defendants.

Judge Liman granted the stay only as to Kap Won Kim and Myong Su Kim and closed their stay motion. He ruled that the bankruptcy stay generally does not protect separate co-defendants whose alleged liability is independent, including alleged joint employers under federal and New York wage laws.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Hong v. Mommy's Jamaican Market Corp. · No. 1:20-cv-09612
Judge
Lewis Liman
Date
May 18, 2023

Background

Kap Won Kim and Myong Su Kim filed for Chapter 13 bankruptcy in the District of New Jersey on May 16, 2023. They asked the court to stay, or pause, this action as to them under the federal bankruptcy law’s automatic-stay provision, 11 U.S.C. § 362(a). Sun Yeul Hong did not oppose the motion.

The court had entered a default judgment against all defendants—Mommy’s Jamaican Market Corp., Kap Won Kim, Myong Su Kim, and Dae Kyu Kim—on October 15, 2021. The defendants later moved to undo that judgment and to respond to Hong’s complaint late. The court granted that motion and reopened the case. Hong then moved to set aside the order that had undone the default judgment, arguing that the basis for that earlier order had been called into question.

An evidentiary hearing was scheduled for May 19, 2023. Because the earlier default judgment covered all defendants, Hong’s motion to set aside the order also covered all defendants.

Court’s analysis

The court held that the bankruptcy automatic stay applied to the action against Kap Won Kim and Myong Su Kim. It therefore granted the motion to stay the action as to those two defendants.

The court declined to extend the stay to Mommy’s Jamaican Market Corp. and Dae Kyu Kim. It explained that the automatic stay generally does not protect non-bankrupt co-defendants. Although a court may extend a stay in limited circumstances—for example, when a claim against a non-bankrupt defendant would immediately harm the bankruptcy estate or when the debtor and the other defendant are effectively the same party—the court found no basis to do so on the record before it.

The complaint alleged that all defendants were Hong’s employers under the Fair Labor Standards Act and the New York Labor Law. The court stated that joint employers can be jointly and separately responsible for violations of those laws, and that courts generally do not extend bankruptcy stays to non-bankrupt co-defendants in such wage cases. The court also noted that Kap Won Kim and Myong Su Kim had admitted they no longer owned Mommy’s Jamaican Market Corp., which further undermined extending the stay to the company.

Discovery and ruling

The court also ruled that the automatic stay did not prevent Hong from obtaining testimony or documents from Kap Won Kim and Myong Su Kim for use against the non-bankrupt defendants. The court reasoned that treating discovery from a debtor as barred in every circumstance would prevent a debtor from serving as a witness even in cases where the debtor was not a party. Hong could therefore subpoena their testimony and documents to the extent the information was sought for claims against Mommy’s Jamaican Market Corp. and Dae Kyu Kim.

Judge Lewis J. Liman directed the Clerk of Court to stay the action only as to Kap Won Kim and Myong Su Kim and to close the stay motion, docket number 143. The evidentiary hearing was to proceed as scheduled as to the non-bankrupt defendants.

The authoritative version

Read the full 3-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.